Aside from the New Testament, and aside from classical works that Christian copiests may have edited, there is the Talmud. All of the Talmudic references to Jesus were censored when the Talmud was printed in Christian lands, and most of the references to Jesus in the Talmud are anti-Christian polemics, but in tractate Avoda Zara, 16b:15 through 17a:3, there is a passage that (if you find an un-censored version -- the Sefaria web site has it) describes the encounter between a Rabbi Eliezer and one Ya'akov (Jacob) of Kefar Sekhania, a follower of Jesus. As a result of this encounter, Eliezer was arrested and charged with heresy (probably charged with being a Christian). This story must have taken place not too long before the Bar Kokhba revolt (the year 132), and Eliezer recounts a teaching of Jesus told to him by Ya'akov. This teaching is not in the New Testament, but does not contradict the Jesus we know from there, and it has been passed down to us through a community outside of and opposed to Christianity.
Historical evidence refers to the materials and artifacts that provide information about past events, societies, and cultures. This evidence can include written documents, photographs, oral histories, artifacts, and archaeological findings. Historians analyze and interpret these sources to construct narratives and understand the context of historical events. The reliability and relevance of historical evidence are crucial for accurate historical analysis.
A historical source is an original document or artifact created during the time being studied, such as letters, photographs, or official records. In contrast, historical evidence refers to the information derived from these sources, which historians use to support their interpretations and conclusions about the past. While sources provide the raw materials for historical inquiry, evidence is the analysis and contextual understanding derived from those sources. Essentially, sources are the "what," and evidence is the "how" and "why" that inform our understanding of history.
Dinosaurs appeared on the earth before Jesus according to the present evidence.
historical evidence suggests this theory. The war was Historical.
It isn’t sure they did. In fact, new historical evidence points to the possibility that they lived with them. They had a village down river from the colony and recent historical evidence has found English items in the village and evidence they were living with them.
There is no historical evidence or widely accepted theories that suggest Jesus died in Japan. The traditional belief is that Jesus was crucified in Jerusalem.
There is no historical evidence to suggest that Jesus was hung from a tree. According to biblical accounts, Jesus was crucified on a cross.
There is no historical evidence to suggest that Jesus traveled to India during his lifetime.
There is no historical evidence to support the claim that Jesus went to India during his lifetime.
The Bible is more than a historical document. It is the very Word of God, and as such, what need have we of further evidence and stories of Jesus?
There is no historical evidence to suggest that a solar eclipse occurred during the time of Jesus' crucifixion.
No, there is no historical evidence to suggest that Jesus drank tea during his time on Earth.
There is no historical evidence to definitively prove or disprove whether Jesus visited India during his lifetime.
The historical records of the time in other histories. Such as Roman history. Also other historical books such as the bible. Jesus of Nazareth was mentioned by the Jewish historian Josephus in his writings.
No, there is no historical or biblical evidence to suggest that Jesus had a twin brother. The concept of Jesus having a twin brother is not supported by mainstream Christian beliefs.
No, there is no historical evidence to suggest that Jesus visited the Wailing Wall during his time on Earth.
There is no clear historical evidence that Pontius Pilate repented for his actions in condemning Jesus to crucifixion.