Not to make too fine a point of this, I would say the questions, while similar, beg related but two distinct questions. What is the content of the white man's burden vs what is the concept of the white man's burden have significant enough overlap to be seen as one in the same but to me one springs from the other.
The first question asks what is included in the social construct which I would argue talks of everything including beliefs, but mostly speaks of what exist within its boundaries. Things like institutions, ways of operating, modes of behavior, practices, guidelines; acceptances, allowances vs taboos, and prohibitions.
And the second question, which asks what is the concept of the white man's burden. This I assume is asking for a delineation of the conceptual ideas, models, schemas of the white man's burden.
I see it like this there is a distinction between what is within an animals environment and how that animal perceives that environment. Perception of environment helps an animal create a schema or a process by which it can survive.
The social construct of white or Western identity and therefore the white mans burden was a structure created to resolve and justify anxieties, imperatives, impulses and desires for European expansion and was solidified by religious and secular tradition. Everything from fear of the East, lacking resources, growing European populations, war and more war on continental Europe led to formation of an inclusive European identity and a differentiated other that comprises . . . well . . . the rest of the known or unknown world.
In this way, if everything else in the world is a blank now-where land, and only Europe exist well Europe has to spread Identity to the unknown and blank spaces. The white man's burden.
Basically, a culture forms from the ideas a people have. Ideas, beliefs, and feelings are the sub-parts of culture. Ideas and beliefs aggregate around topics and concerns a group may have about xs and ys, and then a culture forms: a way of thinking and doing that is traditionalized. Again, as stated above there is a difference between what is in an environment and the perception of an organism in that environment. Of course the age old question: "Which came first the chicken or the egg?" causes us to perceive a blurred boundary where everything seems to bleed together.
white mans burden
A lack of resistance to tropical diseases.
the white mans burden was about the u.s. wanting to improve and continue our growth and militarism so we were number one. And so we would not get our heads chopped off by Russian solders.
The White mans burden. They believed that it was their responsibility to "Civilize" the African Natives.
Most defiantly, the white mans burden is talking about how as Americans/white men it is our duty to "help out" other nations who are not as civilized as we are. which was a major excuse for imperialism during that time. Many countries would say that just by being on the same land as the Savages and uncivilized races they were "helping" them even if they were destroying their land and exploiting their resources.
white mans burden
The audience for "The Black Man's Burden" include people who have some educational background and the imperialists.
The civilizing mission
Another name for "white man's burden" was "civilizing mission."
white mans burden
The rhyme scheme for the poem "The White Man's Burden" by Rudyard Kipling is ABAB CDCD EFEF GHGH.
A lack of resistance to tropical diseases.
white mans burden
white mans burden
the white mans burden was about the u.s. wanting to improve and continue our growth and militarism so we were number one. And so we would not get our heads chopped off by Russian solders.
The White mans burden. They believed that it was their responsibility to "Civilize" the African Natives.
Negative attitude of Europeans toward peoples of the non-Western world