0
I've heard that the evidence is bones from excavations, which show that nobody starved. This means that they shared the food equally. Another evidence is that the (quiet expensive and difficult-to-produce) bronze was common among the people in the Indus. In Nile Valley and Mesopotamia it was considered luxury to have things made of bronze, but in Indus Valley everybody had it.
What else can I help you with?
Compare and contrast political religious and social characteristics of Harappa society to those of Mesopotamia and Egypt?
Harappa society, part of the Indus Valley Civilization, exhibited a centralized urban planning system, but its political structure remains less understood compared to the more documented monarchies of Mesopotamia and Egypt. Religiously, while Harappans likely practiced a form of animism and fertility worship, Mesopotamia and Egypt had structured polytheistic religions with elaborate rituals and deities governing natural and societal elements. Socially, Harappa showed signs of relatively egalitarian communities, while Mesopotamia and Egypt had more pronounced social hierarchies with distinct classes, including priests and rulers. Despite these differences, all three civilizations shared agricultural foundations, urban centers, and trade networks that facilitated cultural exchange.
Did Mesopotamia promote the political rights of all citizens?
Mesopotamia, often regarded as one of the world's earliest civilizations, did not promote political rights for all citizens in an egalitarian sense. Social hierarchy played a significant role, with rights and privileges largely dependent on one's class, profession, and gender. While some free citizens, particularly in urban centers, could participate in local governance and hold certain rights, many others, including women and slaves, had limited or no political power. Thus, the political rights in Mesopotamia were not universally accessible.
Which best describes how to people of the Harappa civilization were unique compared to those of most other ancient civilization?
The people of the Harappa civilization, part of the Indus Valley civilization, were unique in their advanced urban planning and standardized weights and measures, which facilitated trade and governance. Their cities, like Harappa and Mohenjo-Daro, featured sophisticated drainage systems, grid layouts, and public baths, showcasing a high level of engineering and social organization. Additionally, unlike many other ancient civilizations, the Harappans had a relatively egalitarian society, with evidence suggesting less pronounced social hierarchies. Their script remains undeciphered, adding to the mystery surrounding their unique cultural identity.
Is the Indian society meritocratic hierarchical egalitarian?
hierarchical
In the presidential of 1892 fear of the populist party's egalitarian proposals such as?
In the presidential race of 1892, fear of the Populist Party's egalitarian proposals (such as __________) caused Southern Democrats to use fraud and intimidation because they feared the effect on white supremacy.
What was the first written egalitarian law?
The Code of Hammurabi, created in ancient Mesopotamia around 1754 BC, is considered one of the earliest written laws promoting egalitarian principles. It included provisions for fair treatment of all members of society, regardless of social status.
Is caste less society possible?
Kerala seems to be the most egalitarian state in India, but as long as there is room for inequality in a civilization, it will happen.
Compare and contrast political religious and social characteristics of Harappa society to those of Mesopotamia and Egypt?
Harappa society, part of the Indus Valley Civilization, exhibited a centralized urban planning system, but its political structure remains less understood compared to the more documented monarchies of Mesopotamia and Egypt. Religiously, while Harappans likely practiced a form of animism and fertility worship, Mesopotamia and Egypt had structured polytheistic religions with elaborate rituals and deities governing natural and societal elements. Socially, Harappa showed signs of relatively egalitarian communities, while Mesopotamia and Egypt had more pronounced social hierarchies with distinct classes, including priests and rulers. Despite these differences, all three civilizations shared agricultural foundations, urban centers, and trade networks that facilitated cultural exchange.
Did Mesopotamia promote the political rights of all citizens?
Mesopotamia, often regarded as one of the world's earliest civilizations, did not promote political rights for all citizens in an egalitarian sense. Social hierarchy played a significant role, with rights and privileges largely dependent on one's class, profession, and gender. While some free citizens, particularly in urban centers, could participate in local governance and hold certain rights, many others, including women and slaves, had limited or no political power. Thus, the political rights in Mesopotamia were not universally accessible.
What was the first egalitarian law?
One of the earliest known examples of an egalitarian law is the Code of Hammurabi, created around 1754 BC in ancient Mesopotamia. This code included provisions for equal treatment under the law, such as setting specific punishments for different social classes based on the principle of "an eye for an eye."
Which best describes how to people of the Harappa civilization were unique compared to those of most other ancient civilization?
The people of the Harappa civilization, part of the Indus Valley civilization, were unique in their advanced urban planning and standardized weights and measures, which facilitated trade and governance. Their cities, like Harappa and Mohenjo-Daro, featured sophisticated drainage systems, grid layouts, and public baths, showcasing a high level of engineering and social organization. Additionally, unlike many other ancient civilizations, the Harappans had a relatively egalitarian society, with evidence suggesting less pronounced social hierarchies. Their script remains undeciphered, adding to the mystery surrounding their unique cultural identity.
What is aComplex societies?
Complex societies are social structures characterized by a high degree of social, political, and economic organization. They typically feature a hierarchical system of governance, diverse occupational roles, and the development of institutions such as religion, education, and trade. These societies often have large populations, advanced technologies, and significant cultural achievements, distinguishing them from simpler, more egalitarian communities. Examples include ancient civilizations like Mesopotamia, Egypt, and the Indus Valley.
What characteristic distinguished early civilizations from the hunter-gather communities that existed before them?
Early civilizations were characterized by the development of complex social hierarchies, urban centers, agriculture-based economies, written language, and formalized systems of government and religion. These features distinguished them from the more mobile and egalitarian nature of hunter-gatherer communities.
Egalitarian in a sentence?
As an Egalitarian, the man was accepting of all nationalities, political affiliations, religions, and sexes. An Egalitarian believes that all people are equal and deserve equal opportunities.
Make a sentence with the word Egalitarian.?
America was founded on egalitarian beliefs and our constitution confirms that belief.
Use egalitarian in a complete sentence?
Mahatma Gandhi was a egalitarian person who believes all people are equal.
How is a primitive society different to a civilization?
A primitive society is typically characterized by a simpler social structure, subsistence lifestyles, and limited technological development, often relying on hunting, gathering, or small-scale agriculture. In contrast, a civilization features more complex social hierarchies, advanced technologies, urban centers, and established systems of governance, trade, and written communication. Civilizations tend to have specialized labor, organized religion, and cultural achievements, whereas primitive societies are often more egalitarian and community-oriented. Overall, the key difference lies in the degree of social organization and technological advancement.
