0
That the jury can judge the law as well as the man. In other words, if they believe the defendent is guilty of breaking the law, but they think the law is wrong, they can find him "not guilty" anyway.
This was done in the days when it was a crime to harbor a runaway slave. Some poor Quaker would be on trial for hiding an African American, and the jury would know for a fact he was guilty. But they'd vote "not guilty" anyway.
What else can I help you with?
In 1833 South Carolina threatened to secede from the Union if what?
the Supreme Court rejected the principle of nullification. -GRADPOINT
What principle did civil obedience share with nullification?
Civil disobedience and nullification both embody the principle of individuals or states resisting federal authority when they perceive laws or actions as unjust. Civil disobedience involves the active, nonviolent refusal to obey certain laws to highlight their perceived moral shortcomings, while nullification refers to a state's right to invalidate federal laws deemed unconstitutional. Both concepts assert the primacy of individual or state conscience over federal mandates, emphasizing the belief that higher moral laws or rights supersede governmental authority.
How did southerners view the idea of state rights and nullification?
north= nullification is good south= nullification is bad
A person accused of a crime was sentenced to life in prison after being denied the right to a jury trial. In that situation which constitutional principle was violated?
The constitutional principle that was violated in this situation is the Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial. This amendment guarantees individuals the right to a trial by an impartial jury in criminal prosecutions, which is a fundamental aspect of due process. Denying this right undermines the fairness of the legal process and can lead to unjust outcomes in the justice system.
What is the relationship of the right of trial by jury to the natural rights philosophy?
The principle of limited government is exemplified by the right to a trial by jury. The right of a trial by jury is the right to have your fate decided by fellow citizens rather than by a government employee.
Can jury nullification be used as a strategy to get excused from jury duty?
No, jury nullification cannot be used as a strategy to get excused from jury duty. Jury nullification is the power of a jury to acquit a defendant even if the evidence shows they are guilty, but it is not a valid reason to be excused from serving on a jury.
What law did Daniel Webster make?
Jury Nullification
How can a jury speak out against an unpopular law?
By acquitting a guilty defendant. This is known as "jury nullification."
What is it called when a jury is refusal on the part to render a verdict according to a law and fact regardless of the evidence presented?
Jury nullification
Why is jury nullification bad?
thats funny, noone has answer why people don't have a right to a trial of a jury of their peers. And those peers are empowered to decide.
Which principle of us Government did the nullification crisis of 1832 challenge?
Federalism
When a jury nullifies is the verdict up for review?
When a jury nullifies, it means they have chosen to disregard the law or evidence and deliver a verdict that conflicts with the judge's instructions. Generally, jury nullification is not subject to review or appeal, as it reflects the jury's discretion in interpreting justice. Courts typically respect the jury's decision, and there are no legal mechanisms to challenge a nullified verdict. However, the circumstances surrounding the nullification might raise questions in future cases or influence legal discussions.
Can a jury nullify a law in a legal trial?
Yes, a jury has the power to nullify a law in a legal trial by choosing not to apply the law to the case before them, even if the evidence supports a guilty verdict. This is known as jury nullification.
How does jury nullification strenghtens American democracy?
Jury nullification gives the People direct control of the law by deliberately and knowingly rejecting evidence, not applying the law or rejecting the law because they believe the law is unjust and it doesn't equate with their sense of morality or fairness; it's a way for the jury to send a message about some larger social issue, or protest the result dictated by the law if it were applied.
What principle of the Constitution did Civil disobedience share with nullification?
Both civil disobedience and nullification stem from the principle of states' rights. Civil disobedience involves individuals challenging unjust laws, while nullification allows states to reject or invalidate federal laws they deem unconstitutional. Both involve a form of resistance against perceived governmental overreach.
What principle is the theory of nullification based on?
that individual states may declare federal law null and void
In 1833 South Carolina threatened to secede from the Union if what?
the Supreme Court rejected the principle of nullification. -GRADPOINT
