Many casaul historians continue to believe that the capture of Vicksburg, Mississippi "cut the Confederacy in half". This is a false idea simply based on the fact that only three of the eleven Rebel states were west of the Mississippi and Louisiana was already partially occupied by Union troops that were garrisoned in New Orleans. Based on logistics and military positions of the Southern forces, the so-called "cut in half" premise ignores the facts of the importance of the fall of Vicksburg in 1863.
It was Gen Ulysses S. Grant's July 1863 victory at the Battle of Vicksburg that cut the Confederacy in half. Vicksburg, Mississippi was the only remaining Confederate stronghold on the Mississippi River, so Grant's victory gave the Union control of the lower Mississippi River, along with splitting the South in two by cutting Richmond off from the Western half of the Confederacy
The Mississippi River
Grant's capture of Vicksburg cut the Confederacy in two.
ksjhd
No, that was the the fall of Vicksburg, on the Mississippi river.
Vicksburg
Vicksburg
It was Gen Ulysses S. Grant's July 1863 victory at the Battle of Vicksburg that cut the Confederacy in half. Vicksburg, Mississippi was the only remaining Confederate stronghold on the Mississippi River, so Grant's victory gave the Union control of the lower Mississippi River, along with splitting the South in two by cutting Richmond off from the Western half of the Confederacy
The battle of Vicksburg.
The Mississippi River
Grant's capture of Vicksburg cut the Confederacy in two.
they basicly cut it in half and named them different things i guess it was a neutral spot
ksjhd
Fall of 1864 till Xmas 1864. After the capture and burning of Atlanta. Sherman did this to cut that part of the confederacy in half and severe all possibility of resupply and reinforcement from the western confederacy.
The Union's plan to cut the Confederacy in half is the creation of of historians who have not studied the situation of Vicksburg carefully. The Confederacy had three states west of the Mississippi, and of the three, Louisiana had already lost the South's largest city, New Orleans, in April of 1862. The so-called "half" is not numerically or geographically correct. Additionally, the Union had control of the Mississippi River both north and south of Vicksburg. The fact that Union attempts to capture Vicksburg, made in itself a " great victory" in light of the Union's failures to capture it. Logistically and militarily, the fall of Vicksburg was a propaganda victory for the North because it made it so. Yes, Confederate President Davis wanted to retain Vicksburg. However, his best general. Robert E. Lee did not see the logic of sending troops from the east to defend Vicksburg. Additionally, on a military basis the problems of Middle Tennessee were more important to the South then any other aspect of the Western theater in 1863. Additionally ,Texas had access to Mexico and Gulf ports. Arkansas bordered Texas, which was rich in supplies, cattle and farmlands. The Union could have saved time and lives by ignoring Vicksburg and placing its forces in other locations.
Once Grant gained control of Vicksburg, it cut the Confederacy in half. Everything west of the Mississippi River had no communication with the rest of the Confederacy. This relates to the Anaconda plan because the more that the Union can split the Confederacy, the weaker it will become and the more likely it will be to surrender.
The Northern military plan had 6 components: 1. Slowly suffocate the South by blockading its coasts.2. Liberate the slaves and undermine the very economic foundation of the South.3. Cut the Confederacy in half by seizing control of the Mississippi River.4. Dismember the Confederacy by sending troops through Georgia and the Carolinas.5. Capture its capital at Richmond.6. Try everywhere to engage the enemy's main strength and grind it into submission.