0
What else can I help you with?
In what way is the Constitution more flexible than the Articles of Confederation?
Amendments to the Articles of Confederation required an absolute unanimous approval. In contrast, the Constitution only required a three quarters approval, thus allowing lenience in the approval of amendments.
How many amendments were passed under the articles of confederations?
Under the Articles of Confederation, only one amendment was successfully passed. This amendment, known as the "Amendments to the Articles of Confederation," was proposed in 1781 but required unanimous consent from all thirteen states for ratification. Due to the difficulties in achieving this consensus, no amendments were ultimately adopted, highlighting the weaknesses of the Articles.
How many votes did each state have under the articles of confederation?
Under the Articles of the Confederation, which was adopted during the American Revolution as the basis of the new government, each state had one vote on pieces of legislation. Under this system, a 3/4 vote was necessary to pass new laws and a unanimous vote was required to add amendments to the Articles.
What was the purpose of the Annapolis meeting in 1785 was to change the articles of confederation?
The purpose was to revise the Articles of Confederation. However, Rhode Island didn't send representatives and the Articles of Confederation required each state to send representatives in order to edit the Articles of Confederation. Because the Articles of Confederation could not be edited, the Articles of Confederation were thrown out and the current Constitution of the United States was created. This meeting is also known as the Constitutional Convention.This is false. The purpose of the meeting in Annapolis in 1785 was not to change the Articles of Confederation.False
Under the Articles of Confederation Congress had representation based on what?
Under the Articles of Confederation, all representation was based on one vote per state. Each state was represented on an equal basis, regardless of size. Legislation under the Articles required a two-thirds vote majority. However, to amend the Articles an affirmative vote from all of the states was required.
According to Article 13 of the Articles of Confederation what percentage of votes by the states was required to ratify any amendments?
13% of the votes
In what way is the Constitution more flexible than the Articles of Confederation?
Amendments to the Articles of Confederation required an absolute unanimous approval. In contrast, the Constitution only required a three quarters approval, thus allowing lenience in the approval of amendments.
How many states had to approve an amendments to the articles of confederation?
The Articles of Confederation required unanimous consent of the states for an amendment. Two attempts were made to amend the Articles of Confederation, each one failing by one vote.
How many amendments were passed under the articles of confederations?
Under the Articles of Confederation, only one amendment was successfully passed. This amendment, known as the "Amendments to the Articles of Confederation," was proposed in 1781 but required unanimous consent from all thirteen states for ratification. Due to the difficulties in achieving this consensus, no amendments were ultimately adopted, highlighting the weaknesses of the Articles.
Why could the constitution be called an illegal document under the articles of confederation?
The Constitution was originally intended to amend the Articles of Confederation and the framers decided to replace it. It would be considered illegal because the Articles required all of the states to ratify amendments and the Constitution only required nine of 13.
How many votes did each state have under the articles of confederation?
Under the Articles of the Confederation, which was adopted during the American Revolution as the basis of the new government, each state had one vote on pieces of legislation. Under this system, a 3/4 vote was necessary to pass new laws and a unanimous vote was required to add amendments to the Articles.
A unanimous vote was required to amend the Articles of Confederation.?
true
The mechanism to alter the articles of confederation required the consent of how many states?
the constitution had to be approved by 13 states
What was the purpose of the Annapolis meeting in 1785 was to change the articles of confederation?
The purpose was to revise the Articles of Confederation. However, Rhode Island didn't send representatives and the Articles of Confederation required each state to send representatives in order to edit the Articles of Confederation. Because the Articles of Confederation could not be edited, the Articles of Confederation were thrown out and the current Constitution of the United States was created. This meeting is also known as the Constitutional Convention.This is false. The purpose of the meeting in Annapolis in 1785 was not to change the Articles of Confederation.False
Under the Articles of Confederation Congress had representation based on what?
Under the Articles of Confederation, all representation was based on one vote per state. Each state was represented on an equal basis, regardless of size. Legislation under the Articles required a two-thirds vote majority. However, to amend the Articles an affirmative vote from all of the states was required.
How many votes were required to pass legislation under the articles of Confederation?
A unanimous vote was required to amend the articles but only a 2/3 majority (9/13) to pass any law.
Why could the constitution be called an illegal document under the rules of article of confederation?
The Constitution could be considered an illegal document under the Articles of Confederation because it was drafted and ratified without the unanimous consent of the states as required by the Articles. The Articles stipulated that any amendments required the agreement of all thirteen states, yet the Constitution was adopted by only nine states. Additionally, the Constitutional Convention operated outside its mandate to merely amend the Articles, effectively overstepping its authority. This perceived illegitimacy fueled debates about the Constitution's validity at the time.
