Without clarifying the context, such as what these plans apply to, this question is unanswerable.
If you are referring to the plans for the US Constitution, then the smaller states preferred that all states have an equal vote in the Congressional Houses.
The physical size of states, small or large, was irrelevant.The size of their populations, however, determined their representation in the lower house of Congress. So states with larger populations are better represented in the House, where the number of representatives is apportioned by population, than in the Senate where each state is represented equally by two Senators.
The electoral college in the US is a compromise reached by the founding fathers. States with smaller populations wanted each state to just have one vote, while states with large populations wanted to have every persons vote. This was not seen as fair by the smaller state because the large states could choose the president every time. So they compromised, each state would have a set number of votes based on the size of that states population.
Large states favored the Virginia Plan because it proposed a bicameral legislature with representation based on population, which would give them more political power and influence in the new government. This plan aligned with their interests, as they had larger populations and would benefit from greater representation compared to smaller states. Additionally, the Virginia Plan aimed to create a stronger central government, which appealed to large states seeking to enhance their economic and political standing.
the states would be represented according to the size of their populations
States with smaller populations supported the New Jersey Plan because it proposed a unicameral legislature with equal representation for each state, regardless of size. This approach ensured that smaller states would have an equal voice in the legislative process, protecting their interests against domination by larger states with greater populations. The plan aimed to preserve the sovereignty of smaller states and maintain a balance of power in the federal system.
The physical size of states, small or large, was irrelevant.The size of their populations, however, determined their representation in the lower house of Congress. So states with larger populations are better represented in the House, where the number of representatives is apportioned by population, than in the Senate where each state is represented equally by two Senators.
Unlike the Senate where every state receives two representatives, House representation is based on state population. So, more populated states would receive more representatives than less populated states.
Urbanization
I prefer to work in big companies
The small states would never agree to a purely representational form of government. They foresaw the annexation of small, ineffective states as the populations of the large states continued to grow and their influence waned.
The electoral college in the US is a compromise reached by the founding fathers. States with smaller populations wanted each state to just have one vote, while states with large populations wanted to have every persons vote. This was not seen as fair by the smaller state because the large states could choose the president every time. So they compromised, each state would have a set number of votes based on the size of that states population.
In the House of Representatives, the number of delegates a state has is based on its population. The states with larger populations would, therefore, have greater representation and could be said to be happier with the system than states with smaller populations.
The Virginia Plan, in having a unicameral legislature whose delegates are assigned by population (much like having just the House of Representatives), favored large states, because their large populations would give them power.
During the framing of the U.S. Constitution, states with smaller populations feared that states with larger populations would have more representation in Congress, and thus more power. The constitution was ratified on June 21, 1788.
Most people would say Ireland, but this holiday has also become popular in a number of countries where there are large Irish populations, including the United States.
Large states favored the Virginia Plan because it proposed a bicameral legislature with representation based on population, which would give them more political power and influence in the new government. This plan aligned with their interests, as they had larger populations and would benefit from greater representation compared to smaller states. Additionally, the Virginia Plan aimed to create a stronger central government, which appealed to large states seeking to enhance their economic and political standing.
The smaller states opposed the Virginia Plan due to issues Federalism and representation. Many of them were anti-Federalist, and they worried that states with larger populations would hold all the power.