The Supreme Court's decision that slavery enjoyed total protection by the Constitution.
because the constitution enabled the northern states to control all money in the country. it kept the northern states in power f mney and the southern states nd kept them poor
My D.I.C.K
Some states believed in the doctrine of states rights in which they did not have to obey Federal Laws if they felt that it violated the constitution.
They had to dissolve their Confederate state governments, and re-apply for their place in the United States under the US Constitution.
To get both the northern and southern states to agree to it. The southern states wanted slaves counted in the population for determining representation in Congress (even though slaves couldn't vote). The northern states wanted them excluded.
Democratic Republic
The northern states began working to end slavery, but the southern states needed slaves because they thought their economy would suffer without them.
The northern states began working to end slavery, but the southern states needed slaves because they thought their economy would suffer without them.
The northern states began working to end slavery, but the southern states needed slaves because they thought their economy would suffer without them.
Some states believed in the doctrine of states rights in which they did not have to obey Federal Laws if they felt that it violated the constitution.
Slavery was economically and culturally entrenched in the southern states in the late eighteenth century. The southern States would not have supported the ratification of the Constitution if it had called for the end of slavery.
Slavery was economically and culturally entrenched in the southern states in the late eighteenth century. The southern States would not have supported the ratification of the Constitution if it had called for the end of slavery.
because the constitution enabled the northern states to control all money in the country. it kept the northern states in power f mney and the southern states nd kept them poor
They argued that the original USA was a voluntary federation of states that could secede when they wanted.
The Southern States were to organise conventions which had to amend their own constitutions so as to conform them with the Constitution of the United States, including the incorporation of the Fourteenth Amendment.
The question of whether the southern states had the right to secede is complex and often debated. From a constitutional perspective, many argue that the Union was intended to be perpetual, and secession violated the Constitution. Additionally, the motivations behind secession, primarily the defense of slavery, raise moral and ethical concerns. Ultimately, while states' rights were a significant issue, the legal and moral implications of secession suggest that it was not justified.
My D.I.C.K