The British took away property.
The British took away property.
Um actually most Native Americans were Neutral meaning would not take the Patriots nor Britains side. They did not believe violence solved anything and tried to stay out of the wars.
Loyalists and patriots took opposing stances during the American Revolution primarily due to differing views on governance, loyalty, and identity. Loyalists remained faithful to the British crown, believing that British rule provided stability and protection, while patriots sought independence, driven by a desire for self-governance and resistance to perceived tyranny. Economic interests, social ties, and the influence of Enlightenment ideas also played significant roles in shaping their perspectives, leading to deep divisions within colonial society. Ultimately, these contrasting beliefs about freedom, rights, and authority fueled the conflict between the two groups.
They are not treated well at all. Some got their houses vandalized or burned. Others were beaten or got tar and feathered. ( That's when people striped others, poured hot tar on them and covered them in chicken feathers. Most people did not survive these.) After the war the Loyalists were kicked out of the country and went off to British Canada.
Equal rights!
The British took away property.
During The Revolutionary War, people either sided with the king, loyalists, or people who wanted freedom, patriots. Neutralists were the group who sided with any, they simply did not really care!
Um actually most Native Americans were Neutral meaning would not take the Patriots nor Britains side. They did not believe violence solved anything and tried to stay out of the wars.
Loyalists and patriots took opposing stances during the American Revolution primarily due to differing views on governance, loyalty, and identity. Loyalists remained faithful to the British crown, believing that British rule provided stability and protection, while patriots sought independence, driven by a desire for self-governance and resistance to perceived tyranny. Economic interests, social ties, and the influence of Enlightenment ideas also played significant roles in shaping their perspectives, leading to deep divisions within colonial society. Ultimately, these contrasting beliefs about freedom, rights, and authority fueled the conflict between the two groups.
Nobody can take your natural rights away.
The state can not take away your rights that the fed constitution grants to each citizen it has no rights to take away. They belong to you not the state.
They are not treated well at all. Some got their houses vandalized or burned. Others were beaten or got tar and feathered. ( That's when people striped others, poured hot tar on them and covered them in chicken feathers. Most people did not survive these.) After the war the Loyalists were kicked out of the country and went off to British Canada.
The government was allowed to take away individual rights in times of war.
Generally, you cannot take anyone's ownership rights away from them. That must be done by them voluntarily or by a court order.Generally, you cannot take anyone's ownership rights away from them. That must be done by them voluntarily or by a court order.Generally, you cannot take anyone's ownership rights away from them. That must be done by them voluntarily or by a court order.Generally, you cannot take anyone's ownership rights away from them. That must be done by them voluntarily or by a court order.
An alienable right is a right that can be signed away to someone else, usually a governing body, who can then take it away from you. Alienable rights are different from unalienable, which are inherent to all people and any contract signing them away is invalid. It is just to take away alienable rights that have been contracted away, but always unjust to take away alienable rights.
Equal rights!
The idea that the government does not have complete power; there are certain rights the government cannot take away from the people is called LIMITED GOVERNMNET.Tcarver6 Answered!!!