The initial British Strategy to proceed against the French with only British soldiers and a limited amount of resources allocated to finish the job. This proved a flawed policy and the first two years of the war were won by the French. Only after allocating sufficient resources and mixing troops was Britain able to gain control and win the war.
They won because the British gave up
they wanted to win and focus more on war
The Carthaginians didn't win any of the Punic Wars. However, they won important battles in the first two, including the battles of Cannae, Trebia and Lake Trasimene.
the british empire always won wars because they had a great navy. plus they had had recently had the industrial revolution so they were ahead of everyone else. because they were a little island and had a great navy, they would win and the enemy would lose a lot of money (because they had to build a navy to get to England, - the small island).
CHARGED
There are many strategies that the continental army used during war. In most cases, they used the guerilla tactics to win wars.
WW1 and WW2
They won because the British gave up
Yes, but only one.
they wanted to win and focus more on war
Which war. Britain has been involved in many wars.
At least a couple of times. The Anglo-French war of 1117-1120 resulted in an English/ British win, as did the Napoleonic Wars.
LULAC
yes, she is used her wisdom to defeat the wars
fighting a traditional war rather than trying to win the cilvilian support.
The British did not win.
No. The Boer Wars (there were two) both took place in the country of South Africa between the "original" Dutch settlers called "Boers", meaning "Farmer" in Dutch, and the British colonists. "Native" South Africans, like the Zulu, Xhosa, etc. were involved in these wars as well. The British used concentration camps to win the second Boer War. The Boer wars also have nothing to do with either Iraq or Kuwait.