0
What else can I help you with?
The Federalist Papers presented strong and convincing arguments in favor of?
adopting the constitution
Double-column chart noting especially the arguments you considered most effective and those you found faulty or deceptive What made these arguments powerful or weak Were you more convin?
In evaluating the arguments presented in the double-column chart, I found the use of credible data and expert testimonials to be particularly effective, as they provided a strong foundation for the claims made. Conversely, arguments relying on emotional appeals or anecdotal evidence appeared weak and potentially deceptive, as they lacked empirical support. The powerful arguments were convincing due to their logical coherence and factual backing, while the weaker ones failed to persuade me due to their reliance on subjective experiences rather than solid evidence. Overall, the clarity and reliability of the strongest arguments made a significant impact on my perspective.
Why were the British able to expand?
it had a strong stable government.
Did Alexander Hamilton like the British?
The British had a Strong National government. Alexander Hamilton want a strong National government. Hamilton and Jefferson were fighting all the time over that. That might be why. Federlists.
What major arguments did the anti Federalist offer in opposition to ratification of the constitution?
The answer to this question is this.... They opposed having such a strong central government and thus were against the Constitution.
What strong emotional arguments does Paine use to demonize the British King?
Jehehej
What is fallacies?
Fallacies are errors in reasoning that weaken arguments by making them unsound or invalid. They can include faulty logic, misleading information, or inappropriate emotional appeals. Recognizing and avoiding fallacies is important for constructing strong, persuasive arguments.
How would you reply to josiah strong arguments?
No, arguments can either be strong or weak, however, a valid argument would be considered a sound argument. The opposite would be an invalid argument.
What are the distinguished features of cogent and uncogent arguments?
Both are inductive arguments, cogent is strong with all true premises, uncogent is either weak, or strong but with one or more false premises or both.
The work by Rogier van der Weyden the composition of this painting is intended to?
have a strong emotional effect...
What is often strong between a character and the setting he or she lives in?
People always have a strong emotional connection to their homes - doesn't have to be a good connection, but it's always emotional.
The Federalist Papers presented strong and convincing arguments in favor of?
adopting the constitution
How did the Canadians view the war of passchendaele?
Canada viewed the war at Passchendaele in all aspects.. Canada had a very strong emotional tie with Britain," it was stated that the Canadians were more British than the British themselves". However not all Canada had this strong emotional tie only English speaking Canadians French speaking Canadians saw the war being similar to the Boer war and showed no interest. Just as important as the emotional tie with Britain was the restless sprit that effected young men. The sound of war excited them and drew them closer into going. Canadians went to war because of strong emotional ties with Britain but while coming back they came as a proud victorious nation. The war helped them realize they were something more important and bigger than just a small part of the British Empire.
Who were the first types of humans to show to show strong emotional connects to one another?
who were the first types of humans to show strong emotional connects to one another
Is it true that valid arguments are said to be strong or weak?
Valid arguments are not described as strong or weak. Validity refers to the logical structure of an argument - if the premises logically lead to the conclusion. An argument can be valid but still weak if the premises are not well-supported or sound.
Arguments for or agents the constitution?
created a strong national government(arguments for) Article of federalist was against because they believe to much power in the hand of big government.
How do you ensure emotional maturity?
In the model of Transactional Analysis, the adult within needs to be strong to ensure emotional maturity.
