0
What else can I help you with?
What term do historians use to describe the historical period between the beginning of 16th and 21th century?
Modern era
Why historians describe the contact between Europeans and Native Americans as a Columbian Exchange?
Because the era started with the first voyage of Columbus after whom it is named.
How do historians use time periods?
Historians use time periods to organize and structure their study of history, allowing them to categorize events, trends, and developments within a specific context. These periods help to highlight significant changes and continuities over time, making it easier to analyze social, political, economic, and cultural transformations. By defining distinct eras, historians can also facilitate comparative studies between different societies or regions, enhancing our understanding of historical dynamics. Ultimately, time periods serve as frameworks that guide research, interpretation, and communication of historical narratives.
How reliable is film as a source of historical evidence?
The use of film in the pursuit of historical truth is a much debated topic and only recently has become a major medium in the way people perceive the past. The general idea behind historical films is to get the historical facts out to the public, but also to entertain and it is the balance between these two that causes much dilemma in the debate between historians and film makers. The balance is sometimes tipped towards the historians, and the film becomes a drab and boring documentary that doesn't appeal to the general public. If the film is tipped towards the filmmakers, we get an entertaining storyline and special effects, but lots of historical inaccuracies. This appeals to the general public and generates more revenue, which is why it is more common practice. This being said, film is not a very reliable source for historical evidence as it is most likely plagued with inaccuracies and anachronisms.
What is the difference between a historical source and a historical evidence?
A historical source is an original document or artifact created during the time being studied, such as letters, photographs, or official records. In contrast, historical evidence refers to the information derived from these sources, which historians use to support their interpretations and conclusions about the past. While sources provide the raw materials for historical inquiry, evidence is the analysis and contextual understanding derived from those sources. Essentially, sources are the "what," and evidence is the "how" and "why" that inform our understanding of history.
What term do historians use to describe the historical period between the beginning of 16th and 21th century?
Modern era
Which term do historians used to describe the historical period between the beginning of the 16th century and the 21st century?
This answer is now correct. Post-Answer: Modern Era
Which term do historians use to describe the historical period between the beginning of the 16th century and 21st century?
This answer is now correct. Post-Answer: Modern Era
Which term do historians use to describe the historical period between the beginning of the 16th century and the 21st century?
This answer is now correct. Post-Answer: Modern Era
Which term historian use to describe the historical period between the beginning of the 16th century and the 21st century?
This answer is now correct. Post-Answer: Modern Era
Beginning in the late 15th century, interactions between Europe, Africa, Asia, and the Americas exposed people in these areas to plant new, plants animals, cultures, and diseases. Historians describe this process of exposure as the?
Colombian Exchange
Why historians use historical thinking skills?
Historians use historical thinking skills to critically analyze and interpret past events, identify patterns and trends, provide context to historical events, and make connections between past and present. These skills help historians to form well-supported arguments and conclusions about the significance and impact of historical events.
Why is it useful for for historians to base certain studies on the analysis of historial themes?
Studying historical themes helps historians identify patterns and trends over time, providing a broader context for understanding historical events. By analyzing recurring themes, historians can gain insights into underlying social, cultural, and political dynamics that shape historical developments. This approach allows historians to make connections between different time periods and regions, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of history.
Why historians describe the contact between Europeans and Native Americans as a Columbian Exchange?
Because the era started with the first voyage of Columbus after whom it is named.
Name a book in the Bible beginning with A?
Amos - Minor Prophet in the Old Testament (between Joel and Obadiah) Acts - Historical Narrative in the New Testament (between John's Gospel and Romans)
How do historians define the term of causation?
Historians define causation as the relationship between events or phenomena where one or more factors directly influence or bring about another event. This concept involves understanding the complexities of historical events, including multiple causes and their interactions, rather than attributing outcomes to a single factor. Causation helps historians analyze how social, political, economic, and cultural elements converge to shape historical narratives. Ultimately, it emphasizes the importance of context and the interconnectedness of events in understanding history.
What eh carr said about history?
E.H. Carr, a prominent historian, argued that history is not just a collection of facts but a narrative shaped by the interpretations of historians. He emphasized the importance of understanding the context in which historical events occur and how these events are perceived over time. Carr believed that history is a dialogue between the past and the present, with historians playing an active role in interpreting and reconstructing historical narratives. His work highlights the subjective nature of historical analysis and the influence of contemporary values on our understanding of the past.
