answersLogoWhite

0

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about General History

What were Britains motives for World War 1?

Britains goal was to win the war then continue conquring the world.


Great britains great contribution to modern governments around the world is the development of which system of government?

a paliamentary system


Did Northern Ireland contribute to the British war effort in World War 2?

Yes, the city of Belfast was a major shipbuilder for Britains suffering navy.


What was the name of Britains military during World War 2?

Royal Armoured Corps (RAC) Royal Air Force (RAF) Royal Navy (RN)


What are primary and secondary sources in history?

History is always biased, either intentionally, or unintentionally.History is an abstract term - one might think of EVERYTHING that has survived since its creation as history. A recording is history. A document from the time, a crushed soda can is history - as it tells a story of its use and something about the people of the time.In order to really learn about a historical event, its necessary to read from a variety of sources written or recorded at various times. A book about World War II written in 1943 is going to be very different then a contemporary text. Both with have biases and inaccuracies.Original letters or documents, for example. A secondary source would be an essay, for example, about the original source.____A primary source is something from the period of time, such as a piece of writing or a photograph(if possible), these are only two different examples of primary sources.A secondary source is when someone takes a piece of writing and looks at it and tries to interpret events, often several years later.An example of a primary source would be a picture taken in World War 2 of the beaches of Dunkirk when the British and French were retreating.An example of a secondary source would be of a interpretation of the beaches of Dunkirk several years later.___A primary source is an artifact, record, or recording from the era being studied. This would include letters, diaries, personal histories, official documents and so on written during the period. It would also include interviews of people who actually experienced the event or time being studied. Secondary sources are what people have written about the event, period, or era (usually after reading and studying primary sources and other secondary sources). Basically, primary sources come from people who were there, secondary sources come from people who were not.____The key thing about a primary source is that it is direct evidence, while a secondary source is indirect or later discussion.

Related Questions

What were Britains motives for World War 1?

Britains goal was to win the war then continue conquring the world.


What countries were britains enemies in World War 2?

germany


Did nationalists want to fight for Britains in World War 1?

no...


What is Great Britains ranking in world soccer?

Number 5 as of the Olympics


What led to world war 2 in Singapore?

Britains military base at Singapore.


What is the largest provider of development assistance?

the World Bank


Where can you find a primary source on Cleopatra?

A primary source on Cleopatra simply needs to come from the ancient world. Plutarch wrote about her in a few biographies. Even though he wrote these about 150 years after her death, they are still considered as primary sources.


What has the author Gary Parker Schoales written?

Gary Parker Schoales has written: 'America's Turn to the Right' 'Disillusioned America 1970's (Primary sources in U.S. history)'


Why was liver pool bombed in the world wars?

Because it was one of Britains most important ports


Which problem with reading primary historical sources is best illustrated by Hakluyt's writing that claimed Britain should go to the New World?

Antiquated language


A historian compares transcripts of speeches delivered by powerful leaders throughout world history. These transcripts serve as which of the following?

Answer this ques Primary sources tion…


Which problem with reading primary historical sources is the best illustrated by hakluyt's writing that claimed Britain should go to the new world?

Antiquated language