They were different becuase each class did something different
Mostly like the rest of ancient Roman houses {different ones for different classes}.
There were three, not two, social orders in Rome. The patricians were the land-owning aristocracy. The equites (cavalrymen) were a wealthy entrepreneurial group (bankers, moneylenders, merchants and investors in shipping and mining) whose equite status was like a lower tier of the aristocracy. The plebeians or plebs were the commoners.
The four social classes of Catal Huyuk were the elite or ruling class, the skilled craftsmen/artisans, the farmers, and the slaves. The elite or ruling class would have held positions of power and authority, while skilled craftsmen/artisans had specialized skills such as pottery making. Farmers were responsible for cultivating crops, and slaves were likely used for labor and serving the upper classes.
The Indian social structure was divided into castes of rulers and priests, warriors, merchants and slaves from very ancient times.
indian people are just like aryans so it is the koran
i think it is the peasants like in Egypt's social classes.
The Kush did not have a very advanced social order. However, they did have rulers and those they ruled. They did not have distinct classes like Egypt did.
A shenti was a wrapped skirt that men of all social classes wore. :)
Mostly like the rest of ancient Roman houses {different ones for different classes}.
Yes the two are very similar.
there was, there are and will be like at all other places
because they felt like it
If you were poor then you can't afford an fancy house like one made of stone, you could only like an mud brick house. If you were rich then you could afford an stone brick house.
In the 1930s, America had a clear divide among social classes. The wealthy elite held a lot of power and influence, while the middle class struggled to make ends meet during the Great Depression. Many Americans were living in poverty, leading to widespread economic hardship and social unrest.
like me and my bf see each other at break and sit near each other if you have classes together. like me and my bf see each other at break and sit near each other if you have classes together.
The shape that would best represent a diagram of Egypt's social classes would be a triangle. This is because the pharaoh is at the top and then a few nobles underneath then the large amount of workers.
Pharaoh had all the freedom since he was a god-like being. Priests and Nobles had all the freedom since their the 2nd tier below the Pharaoh. The Middle classes had some what freedom except for the farmers since they had to grow crops for the Pharaoh. The Slaves are the Low classes which have no freedom whatso ever since they are the people who have to do most of the work out of all the social classes like they have to build houses or the town and stuff.