At the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia, Alexander Hamilton's main focus was on creating a strong central government that could effectively manage the nation's financial and political affairs. He advocated for a robust executive branch and a system of checks and balances to prevent tyranny, emphasizing the need for a stable and unified national framework. Hamilton also aimed to address economic issues, promote commerce, and establish a sound financial system to elevate the United States' standing in the world. His vision ultimately influenced the drafting of the Constitution and laid the groundwork for his later policies as the first Secretary of the Treasury.
Actually it was well known by the thought leaders of the 1780s that THE worst form of government is Democracy. Much of what Madison did in preparation for the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia in 1787 was to bring to the convention all the forms of government for the past 4,000 years. The worst form? Again - Democracy. That's why we live in a Constitutional Republic. Here is a good example of Democracy: Two wolves and a sheep vote on what is for dinner... Democracy is too susceptible to demagoguery and emotion of the moment. Plus they are busy with their own lives, so they vote to hopefully elect someone they believe will focus and research items more thoughtfully. Our Founding Fathers rated monarchy as far more effective than democracy.
Alexander Hamilton was glad Thomas Jefferson did not attend the Constitutional Convention because he believed Jefferson's strong anti-federalist views could have undermined the formation of a strong central government. Hamilton, a proponent of a robust federal structure, feared that Jefferson's presence might have led to more emphasis on states' rights and less focus on national unity. Additionally, Hamilton saw Jefferson as a rival, and Jefferson's absence allowed Hamilton to push for his vision without significant opposition.
abolition of slavery
The debate over the formation of a new American government primarily excluded women, enslaved individuals, Native Americans, and non-white populations. These groups had little to no representation in the Constitutional Convention or subsequent political discussions, as the focus was predominantly on the interests of wealthy white landowners. Consequently, issues affecting these marginalized groups were largely ignored in the foundational structures of the new government.
The issuance of the Emancipation Proclamation by President Abraham Lincoln can be seen as both a strategic necessity and a constitutional overreach. While Lincoln justified the proclamation as a wartime measure aimed at weakening the Confederacy, critics argue that it exceeded his presidential authority, as it was not based on a direct constitutional mandate. Ultimately, the proclamation shifted the war's focus to ending slavery, aligning with Lincoln's moral convictions, but it also sparked intense debate about executive power and civil liberties. Thus, whether he overstepped his bounds largely depends on one's interpretation of his constitutional role during a national crisis.
The main focus of the Great Compromise at the Constitutional Convention concerned how states were to be represented in the U.S. Congress. It is also referred to as Sherman's Compromise.
A small state would prefer the number of representatives to be the same for each state. This was the focus of the New Jersey plan, which was proposed at the Constitutional Convention in 1787.
Style, Content, Organization, Convention, and focus
Actually it was well known by the thought leaders of the 1780s that THE worst form of government is Democracy. Much of what Madison did in preparation for the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia in 1787 was to bring to the convention all the forms of government for the past 4,000 years. The worst form? Again - Democracy. That's why we live in a Constitutional Republic. Here is a good example of Democracy: Two wolves and a sheep vote on what is for dinner... Democracy is too susceptible to demagoguery and emotion of the moment. Plus they are busy with their own lives, so they vote to hopefully elect someone they believe will focus and research items more thoughtfully. Our Founding Fathers rated monarchy as far more effective than democracy.
States' rights
abolition of slavery
Yes, agree because if they were to tell everyone, which yeah some more people might help after hearing it but at the same time, people that don't want to will tell the British and then they'll know somethings up.(S.S)
taxes stock markets the U.S.
The debate over the formation of a new American government primarily excluded women, enslaved individuals, Native Americans, and non-white populations. These groups had little to no representation in the Constitutional Convention or subsequent political discussions, as the focus was predominantly on the interests of wealthy white landowners. Consequently, issues affecting these marginalized groups were largely ignored in the foundational structures of the new government.
Two kinds of formal changes to state constitutions are amendments and revisions. Amendments are specific changes or additions to the existing constitution, typically requiring a legislative proposal followed by voter approval. Revisions, on the other hand, involve a more comprehensive overhaul of the constitution and may necessitate a constitutional convention or a more extensive legislative process. While amendments focus on particular issues, revisions address broader structural or foundational changes.
All lawyers and judges (formerly lawyers) should be taken out and shot, as was observed by Horace Greeley!
Bhutan is a landlocked country in the Eastern Himalayas, known for its stunning natural landscapes and strong cultural heritage. It is a constitutional monarchy with a unique focus on Gross National Happiness as a measure of progress.