0
Both the poor and wealthy Romans shared a deep attachment to their family and social networks, which were central to Roman identity. Additionally, they both participated in public life, albeit in different ways; wealthy Romans held political power and influence, while the poor engaged in community activities and attended public games and festivals. Furthermore, both groups expressed a strong sense of loyalty to Rome, often celebrating its culture and achievements together.
What else can I help you with?
What were the wealthy landowners of ancient rome were called?
the PATRICIANS. the poor, common people were the PLEBIANS.
Was King George III wealthy or poor?
He was wealthy.
How did the poor people of roman survive without jobs?
Most of the time, they were slaves or Laborers. Wealthy Romans often owned huge portions of land which included farms. So, many less wealthy Romans worked on farms or they took care of the livestock as shepherds.
Why do you have less evidence about the poor Romans than the rich Romans?
Since whatever the poor used must have been something that could not endure staying the same shape for years and years to come. And because when whoever took over the Romans they kept the good stuff ( Rich romans houses and mansions...) and destroyed the things they didn't need ( poor people things) Addition Look for books by Mary Beard on the excavations at Pompeii. For example the contents of the sewers can be examined to find what the rich and poor ate. She says the poor were surprisingly well fed.
What was daily life like for roman women describe two differences that existed between women who were wealthy and those who were poor?
The Romans, like us, were individuals and their daily lives varied with their occupations and their interests. This is true for both rich and poor. Each group had to make a living, provide for their families and take care of daily needs. The difference was that the wealthy had more slaves to help them out and consequently more leisure time. The poor person had to devote more time to his everyday concerns. It goes without saying, that the housing differed between the rich and poor and the wealthy could afford luxuries that the poor guy could not, but this was a matter of finances, (or lack of them) not a matter of their basic lives.The Romans, like us, were individuals and their daily lives varied with their occupations and their interests. This is true for both rich and poor. Each group had to make a living, provide for their families and take care of daily needs. The difference was that the wealthy had more slaves to help them out and consequently more leisure time. The poor person had to devote more time to his everyday concerns. It goes without saying, that the housing differed between the rich and poor and the wealthy could afford luxuries that the poor guy could not, but this was a matter of finances, (or lack of them) not a matter of their basic lives.The Romans, like us, were individuals and their daily lives varied with their occupations and their interests. This is true for both rich and poor. Each group had to make a living, provide for their families and take care of daily needs. The difference was that the wealthy had more slaves to help them out and consequently more leisure time. The poor person had to devote more time to his everyday concerns. It goes without saying, that the housing differed between the rich and poor and the wealthy could afford luxuries that the poor guy could not, but this was a matter of finances, (or lack of them) not a matter of their basic lives.The Romans, like us, were individuals and their daily lives varied with their occupations and their interests. This is true for both rich and poor. Each group had to make a living, provide for their families and take care of daily needs. The difference was that the wealthy had more slaves to help them out and consequently more leisure time. The poor person had to devote more time to his everyday concerns. It goes without saying, that the housing differed between the rich and poor and the wealthy could afford luxuries that the poor guy could not, but this was a matter of finances, (or lack of them) not a matter of their basic lives.The Romans, like us, were individuals and their daily lives varied with their occupations and their interests. This is true for both rich and poor. Each group had to make a living, provide for their families and take care of daily needs. The difference was that the wealthy had more slaves to help them out and consequently more leisure time. The poor person had to devote more time to his everyday concerns. It goes without saying, that the housing differed between the rich and poor and the wealthy could afford luxuries that the poor guy could not, but this was a matter of finances, (or lack of them) not a matter of their basic lives.The Romans, like us, were individuals and their daily lives varied with their occupations and their interests. This is true for both rich and poor. Each group had to make a living, provide for their families and take care of daily needs. The difference was that the wealthy had more slaves to help them out and consequently more leisure time. The poor person had to devote more time to his everyday concerns. It goes without saying, that the housing differed between the rich and poor and the wealthy could afford luxuries that the poor guy could not, but this was a matter of finances, (or lack of them) not a matter of their basic lives.The Romans, like us, were individuals and their daily lives varied with their occupations and their interests. This is true for both rich and poor. Each group had to make a living, provide for their families and take care of daily needs. The difference was that the wealthy had more slaves to help them out and consequently more leisure time. The poor person had to devote more time to his everyday concerns. It goes without saying, that the housing differed between the rich and poor and the wealthy could afford luxuries that the poor guy could not, but this was a matter of finances, (or lack of them) not a matter of their basic lives.The Romans, like us, were individuals and their daily lives varied with their occupations and their interests. This is true for both rich and poor. Each group had to make a living, provide for their families and take care of daily needs. The difference was that the wealthy had more slaves to help them out and consequently more leisure time. The poor person had to devote more time to his everyday concerns. It goes without saying, that the housing differed between the rich and poor and the wealthy could afford luxuries that the poor guy could not, but this was a matter of finances, (or lack of them) not a matter of their basic lives.The Romans, like us, were individuals and their daily lives varied with their occupations and their interests. This is true for both rich and poor. Each group had to make a living, provide for their families and take care of daily needs. The difference was that the wealthy had more slaves to help them out and consequently more leisure time. The poor person had to devote more time to his everyday concerns. It goes without saying, that the housing differed between the rich and poor and the wealthy could afford luxuries that the poor guy could not, but this was a matter of finances, (or lack of them) not a matter of their basic lives.
What do poor Romans and rich Romans have in common?
They have citizenship, which places them in a privileged relationship with non-citizens.
Did Poor Romans bathed daily while rich Romans just used more perfumes?
No, no and no. The Roman daily bath was almost a ritual with them. The wealthy were more apt to use the baths for social and business contacts than the poor.
What were the wealthy landowners of ancient rome were called?
the PATRICIANS. the poor, common people were the PLEBIANS.
Is Honduras poor or wealthy?
it is poor
Did the common people eat the same as the Wealthy did?
No. Poor people would eat such things as beans and corn while the wealthy would eat lobster and shrimps.
Was Pieter Brueghel wealthy or poor?
he lived regularly not to wealthy nor too poor
What kind of houses did wealthy Romans live in?
The poorer Romans generally lived in apartment buildings called "insulae".The poorer Romans generally lived in apartment buildings called "insulae".The poorer Romans generally lived in apartment buildings called "insulae".The poorer Romans generally lived in apartment buildings called "insulae".The poorer Romans generally lived in apartment buildings called "insulae".The poorer Romans generally lived in apartment buildings called "insulae".The poorer Romans generally lived in apartment buildings called "insulae".The poorer Romans generally lived in apartment buildings called "insulae".The poorer Romans generally lived in apartment buildings called "insulae".
Was King George III wealthy or poor?
He was wealthy.
Where the anasazi poor or wealthy?
The Anasazi were very wealthy.
Was Giles Corey wealthy or poor?
he was poor
Was Inca economy poor or wealthy?
poor
Was derrick rose poor or wealthy?
poor
