The main issue in the debate over affirmative action revolves around the balance between promoting diversity and addressing historical inequalities versus ensuring equal treatment and opportunities for all individuals, regardless of race or background. Proponents argue that affirmative action helps rectify systemic discrimination and creates a more inclusive society, while opponents contend that it can lead to reverse discrimination and undermine meritocracy. This tension highlights broader societal questions about fairness, equity, and the role of government in addressing social injustices.
The purpose of a main motion is to introduce a specific proposal for consideration and debate within a deliberative assembly, such as a board or committee. It serves as the foundation for discussion, allowing members to express their views and ultimately vote on the proposed action. Main motions must be clearly stated and are typically subject to debate and amendments before a final decision is made.
Senator John F. Kennedy's main issue in the campaign of 1960 was that
The main issue in the 1844 election was the annexation of Texas. John Tyler had hoped that this would help him to gain popular support.
Representation in Congress :)
offer traditional or vocational education (apex)
America succeeded to implement the affirmative action because it had great support from the citizens. The main aim was to help curb discrimination in America.
The opening speech in favor of the resolution is called an "affirmative constructive speech." It outlines the main arguments and points supporting the resolution and sets the tone for the debate.
resolution :p
The main issue was when Edmund Randolph said that the goverment would need power to raise an army.
Third speaker of affirmative:1. Speaks after second Negative.2. Concludes argument of Affirmative team.3. Rebuts arguements of second Negative and whole Negative team.4. Summarises whole argument of Affirmative team.Third speaker of negative:1. Speaks after third affirmative.2. Stresses main points of negative argument. (Cannot raise any new points)3. Rebuts arguements of third affirmative, and whole affirmative team.4. Summarises whole argument of Negative team.I hope this helps (-:
As it stands today in the US, affirmative action policies are not a main point of discussion. There are several reasons why. One is that the programs did not work very well. The other is that, aside, from recessions, discrimination in hiring practices is rare and against the law. The topic is controversial.
The main ISSUE of the DEBATE was whether slavery be allowed to expand to new territories. The REASON the debates were held was for a seat in the Illinois Senate.
An example of a beside the point fallacy in a debate is when someone brings up irrelevant information or arguments that do not address the main issue being discussed.
Affirmative (for):define the topicpresent the affirmative team's lineoutline briefly what each speaker in their team will talk aboutpresent the first half of the affirmative caseNegative (against):accept or reject the definition. If you don't do this it is assumed that you accept the definition.present the negative team lineoutline briefly what each of the negative speakers will say.rebut a few of the main points of the first affirmative speaker.the 1st negative should spend about one quarter of their time rebutting.present the first half of the negative team's case.
the opening statement in a court case. It presents the main arguments and evidence in a clear and persuasive manner to establish the speaker's position and set the tone for the rest of the debate. Both aim to engage the audience or judge and lay the foundation for the speaker's case.
To write a third speaker debating speech:1. You need to start it off addressing the chairperson and then the audience: "Chairperson, ladies and gentlemen".2. Do not begin your speech by saying "today's debate is..." as the chairperson has already informed the audience of the topic.3. Your opening is vital if you hope to capture the audience's attention. Work hard on preparing an interesting opening.4. An interesting opening and a forceful conclusion are important elements of a successful debating speech. It's worth memorising these.5. Don't thank the audience- they will thank you with a round of applause.Third speaker of affirmative:1. Speaks after second Negative.2. Concludes argument of Affirmative team.3. Rebuts arguements of second Negative and whole Negative team.4. Summarises whole argument of Affirmative team.Third speaker of negative:1. Speaks after third affirmative.2. Stresses main points of negative argument. (Cannot raise any new points)3. Rebuts arguements of third affirmative, and whole affirmative team.4. Summarises whole argument of Negative team.
Formal debate has to many rules for me to go over right now. But basically you have two teams, one presents a plan and the other tries to show it as a bad idea. This is the main concept of informal debates, but formal debates take it a step further. In formal debates you have 5 stock issues (inherency, solvency, topicality, harms, and significance) the affirmative must win all 5 stock issues to win the debate, the negative must only win on one or more stock issues to win the debate. ALL THE ABOVE