Romes geography, government, virtue, trade, building, and military all worked torward making it possibly the greatest empire ever.
There was no successor in the west besides a thing called the Holy Roman Empire which had nothing to do with ancient Rome. In the east it was the Ottoman empire.
No similarities. The Roman Empire was an ancient empire and the Carolingian Empire was a medieval one and therefore related to two totally different societies. The only thing was that Latin was the language of the church, bureaucrats and intellectuals.
Please clarify your question. The word "who" refers to a person, the word "empire" is a thing. Are you asking about an emperor or the size of the empire?
The most important thing that the government did to unify the Roman empire was to have one system or code of laws for everyone. The granting of Roman citizenship and the protection of the army were also unifying factors.
You have to be more specific as to what you mean by the "Byzantine Empire". If you are asking about the eastern part of the Roman empire, which historians have dubbed "Byzantine" (after the city of Byzantium), be aware that there was no such thing. It was the Roman empire-- period. Historians used the term Byzantine when they were referring to the eastern parts of the Roman empire in order to differentiate between the two areas of the empire.
There was no such thing as a reign of terror in the Roman Empire
There was no successor in the west besides a thing called the Holy Roman Empire which had nothing to do with ancient Rome. In the east it was the Ottoman empire.
The ability to engineer great buildings and infrastructure was a Roman ideal. It was not a reason why the Roman Empire declined.
No similarities. The Roman Empire was an ancient empire and the Carolingian Empire was a medieval one and therefore related to two totally different societies. The only thing was that Latin was the language of the church, bureaucrats and intellectuals.
king
Please clarify your question. The word "who" refers to a person, the word "empire" is a thing. Are you asking about an emperor or the size of the empire?
The most important thing that the government did to unify the Roman empire was to have one system or code of laws for everyone. The granting of Roman citizenship and the protection of the army were also unifying factors.
You have to be more specific as to what you mean by the "Byzantine Empire". If you are asking about the eastern part of the Roman empire, which historians have dubbed "Byzantine" (after the city of Byzantium), be aware that there was no such thing. It was the Roman empire-- period. Historians used the term Byzantine when they were referring to the eastern parts of the Roman empire in order to differentiate between the two areas of the empire.
There is no such thing as a western Byzantine Empire, only an east (Byzantine) and west Roman Empire.
No. It was not even close geographically nor did it have any military advantage. However it was the cultural center of the empire as it had the great library and museo and it also remained a major trade center.
the most important thing about the civil rights and habeas corpus was that the civil rights didnt have a choice to protect themselves because they were the slaves of the holy roman empire and habeas corpus had the right and the will to do anything they wanted because they were the loyalty they were the ones who assisted and obeyed the law of the holy roman emperor and that was the most important thing about the civil rights and habeas corpus.
He built it by taking over the Babylonian and Lydian Empires, and consolidating these and Persian-Mede territory.