The official reason that the president (George Bush) gave was that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction, or nuclear weapons, that were potentially harmful to the USA.
The unofficial reason was that America had had enough of Saddam Hussein and wanted him out of government.
i think there are a lot of comparison meaning that they both did somthing wong the difference now is the Iraq war are there in Iraq for the wrong reason so basically for no reason at all.
Yes, but the intervention was delayed for six months to get the necessary UN approval.
Iran and Iraq. It was called the Iran-Iraq War, beginning in 1980 and lasting until 1988.
Replacing Sadam Hussein's government with a democratic government was intended to stabilize Iraq and to eliminate the weapons of mass destruction that Sadam Hussein claimed to posses. By stabilizing Iraq, it was expected that it would stabilize the region.
The Iran-Iraq War 1980-1988, was one of the longest wars fought in that region.
Restore law, order and stability to the region.
i think there are a lot of comparison meaning that they both did somthing wong the difference now is the Iraq war are there in Iraq for the wrong reason so basically for no reason at all.
Iraq War!! Bush and Cheney!
Opposition to the war in Iraq stemmed from concerns about the justification for military action, particularly the claims of weapons of mass destruction that were never found. Many critics argued that the invasion destabilized the region, leading to increased violence and sectarian conflict. Additionally, there were fears about the humanitarian impact on the Iraqi population and skepticism regarding the long-term effectiveness of military intervention in achieving peace and democracy. Economic concerns, including the war's cost and its impact on domestic priorities, also fueled dissent.
The premise for the war in Iraq was not one of humanitarianism. The justification for the war in Iraq was based on the belief that Iraq was associated with the terrorist strikes on 9-11 and that they were pursuing and creating weapons of mass destruction.Both claims were proven false after the fall of Iraq.
You don't even want to know the real reason.
Yes, but the intervention was delayed for six months to get the necessary UN approval.
Iran and Iraq. It was called the Iran-Iraq War, beginning in 1980 and lasting until 1988.
A long-term war would be costly in men and materiel, would de-stabilize the region and probably be opposed by the American people .
The US was waging war against the nation of NORTH VIETNAM. The US is "not" waging war against the country of Iraq. The US is trying to establish law, order, and stability to the region.
It's a law enforcement function; trying to establish law, order, and stability to the region.
Replacing Sadam Hussein's government with a democratic government was intended to stabilize Iraq and to eliminate the weapons of mass destruction that Sadam Hussein claimed to posses. By stabilizing Iraq, it was expected that it would stabilize the region.