Slaves at the bottom, then freedmen, and free-born citizens at the top. Then the free-born citizens were divided up into the Patricians and the Plebeians. The Patricians could trace their ancestry to one of the 100 Patriarchs at the founding of the city and the Plebeians, or Plebs, could not. Mostly, the Plebs were the common-folk, but that does not mean they could not be rich.
An Aqueduct is the answer. And to embellish this a bit more, I believe there is an aqueduct in Rome that still functions. Perhaps it has been closed down, but years ago when I was a student studying ancient Rome, the aqueduct was working.
the social structure was the government
Just about all western governments are based upon the Roman structure of government in some way.Just about all western governments are based upon the Roman structure of government in some way.Just about all western governments are based upon the Roman structure of government in some way.Just about all western governments are based upon the Roman structure of government in some way.Just about all western governments are based upon the Roman structure of government in some way.Just about all western governments are based upon the Roman structure of government in some way.Just about all western governments are based upon the Roman structure of government in some way.Just about all western governments are based upon the Roman structure of government in some way.Just about all western governments are based upon the Roman structure of government in some way.
The Equites were the social group that were loosely similar to Roman soldiers. In the early days the Equestrians had to supply their own horses and weapons. If a man were wealthy enough to own a horse, and use it in the army, his social status was raised. As time went on the Equites or Knights, as they were sometimes called, became a distinct social class. The Equestrian class had its roots in the Roman army.
The social structures includes gender roles and relationships, family and kinship, economic and social classes and racial and moral construction.This led to the rise of roman republic.
Unrecognized and unintended consequences of the social structure are called social issues or unintended consequences. These can arise from the interactions between different elements of society and have impacts that were not originally anticipated or foreseen by those involved in creating the social structure.
matriarch
The social structure of the Roman Republic was class orientated. The patricians and plebeians made up then nobility with the equites as the middle class. The proletariat were the rest of the free citizens, followed by the freedmen and slaves.
An Aqueduct is the answer. And to embellish this a bit more, I believe there is an aqueduct in Rome that still functions. Perhaps it has been closed down, but years ago when I was a student studying ancient Rome, the aqueduct was working.
Roman nobles were called "patricians." They were members of the wealthy and influential families in ancient Rome who held political power and social status.
The Mayan social structure was divided into the king, nobles, priests, merchants and artisans, and peasants and slaves. There was halach uninic, also called the ahau.
An execution by hanging on a rope noose was done on a structure called a gallows.An ancient Roman form of execution was done on a structure called a cross (in latin crux).
i think its brahmins
Roman toilets were not called baths, they were called foricae. Baths were called thermae and they were social centers in addition to being places to bathe. All the thermae (baths) had foricae (toilets).
The Indian social structure was called the caste system, which divided society into hierarchical groups based on occupation and ancestry. This system determined a person's social status and opportunities in life, with limited mobility between castes.
The ruling class of emperor and senators, the rich, the artists artisans and tradesmen, women, labourers, slaves.
the social structure was the government