Enough, that they were effective.
US attitude towards WW1 The US didn't want to join the war on anyone's side and followed a policy oferjg0edh98ohgoiudybgh9drfhgr8yhb9regh98eryg
Lincoln would use military force only when necessary.
Francisco Franco, the Spanish dictator, had a complex attitude toward war and violence, viewing them as necessary means to achieve and maintain power. His rise to prominence was marked by the brutal Spanish Civil War, where he utilized violence to suppress opposition and establish a fascist regime. Franco believed that military strength and authoritarian control were essential to restore and preserve order in Spain, often justifying his violent tactics as a way to protect the nation from perceived threats. Ultimately, his regime was characterized by repression and a willingness to employ violence to maintain dominance.
I think that his attitude to war was that he thought it was 'pointless' and killed many innocent lives. He thought, 'what's the point in being born if you're just going to die a few years later?' Hope this helped! :D x
Hitler would shoot them since they were of no use for him or use them in experiments.
Australia's "attitude" towards the Vietnam War, mirrored America's attitude.
bowley
"Return with your shield or on it!"
Ted Hughes had a complex attitude towards war. While he acknowledged the brutality and destruction it caused, he also saw war as a fundamental aspect of human nature and a source of inspiration for poetry. He explored themes of conflict, violence, and destruction in his work, often using war as a metaphor for human struggles.
Enough, that they were effective.
mussolinis conquering of ethiopia
During the Vietnam War . Australia attitude towards Asia was cool one aas some countries sided with Vietnam, including Russia and India.
value of mussolinis war photos
in America people had a negative attitude towards the war. They were still getting over WW1 and believed WW2 was Europe's problem and that we should not get involved.
Something with words
because