0
They didn't care for the Indians because they depleted the land of Natural Resources and prevented progress.
What else can I help you with?
What assumption did the British commoners make about the visiting Indians in A Visitor's perspective in A Visit To Europe?
In "A Visit to Europe," British commoners assumed that the visiting Indians were exotic and inferior due to their colonial mindset. They often viewed Indians through a lens of stereotypes, believing them to be unrefined and culturally backward. This perception reflected the broader attitudes of imperialism, where colonized peoples were seen as curiosities rather than equals. The commoners' assumptions highlighted the cultural divide and the lack of understanding between the British and the Indian visitors.
How did the English attitudes toward Indians campare with Africian?
In general there was no difference between these attitudes; except that European courts had determined that "Native Americans" were the legal land owners in [the] Americas and that settlers could not just take the land from them. For this, and only this reason, the attitudes of English Settlers was different.
What was the attitude two people had toward one another during the british rule in India?
During British rule in India, attitudes between the British and Indians were often marked by a sense of superiority and resentment. Many British officials viewed themselves as a civilizing force, believing they were bringing progress to what they considered a backward society. In contrast, many Indians felt oppressed and disrespected, leading to a growing sense of nationalism and a desire for self-determination. This complex dynamic fostered both collaboration and conflict, shaping the socio-political landscape of the time.
With respect to the eighteenth century the concept of the middle ground is helpful in?
The concept of the middle ground is helpful in understanding the attitudes of Indians living between the Appalachians and the Mississippi.
What were the Metis were a mixture of British or French and Indians?
it was the British and Indians i am thinking. i could be wrong though
What was the basic difference between french and english attitudes about the land they acquired in north america?
The French came to be fur traders and travel and work with the Indians. The British came to farm.
Was the French and Indian war was between the French and the Indians?
No, the war was between the French/Indians (VS) British...
What is the passage between India and Italy?
the passage to India to Italy is all about that what was the injustice done with the Indians by the British and what did the British force the Indians to do in return of bribe. and payment of heavy taxation. it is mainly about the struggle between the British and Muslim's.
How did American Indians' attitudes about land change after the European's arrived?
how did american indians attitudes about land use change after the europens arrived
What assumption did the British commoners make about the visiting Indians in A Visitor's perspective in A Visit To Europe?
In "A Visit to Europe," British commoners assumed that the visiting Indians were exotic and inferior due to their colonial mindset. They often viewed Indians through a lens of stereotypes, believing them to be unrefined and culturally backward. This perception reflected the broader attitudes of imperialism, where colonized peoples were seen as curiosities rather than equals. The commoners' assumptions highlighted the cultural divide and the lack of understanding between the British and the Indian visitors.
Why didn't Indians unite against the British in the Sepoy?
Indians did not unite because they had a weak leadership and serious splits between Hindus and Muslims Religion was one reason why Indians did not unite against the British in the Sepoy Mutiny. Indians were split among Muslims and Hindus.
How Did the relationship that existed between the British and the American Indians living in North America?
bruhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
How did the English attitudes toward Indians campare with Africian?
In general there was no difference between these attitudes; except that European courts had determined that "Native Americans" were the legal land owners in [the] Americas and that settlers could not just take the land from them. For this, and only this reason, the attitudes of English Settlers was different.
Why didn't the Indians unite against the british in the sepoy mutiny?
Indians did not unite because they had a weak leadership and serious splits between Hindus and Muslims Religion was one reason why Indians did not unite against the British in the Sepoy Mutiny. Indians were split among Muslims and Hindus.
Why didn't Indians unite against the british in the sepoy mutiny?
Indians did not unite because they had a weak leadership and serious splits between Hindus and Muslims Religion was one reason why Indians did not unite against the British in the Sepoy Mutiny. Indians were split among Muslims and Hindus.
Why didn't Indians unite against the british in sepoy mutiny?
Indians did not unite because they had a weak leadership and serious splits between Hindus and Muslims Religion was one reason why Indians did not unite against the British in the Sepoy Mutiny. Indians were split among Muslims and Hindus.
Who was Alexander Mcgilvray?
Alexander McGillivray was a man who worked for peace between the Creek Indians and the British.
