1) If a serf could run away for a year and one day, it was considered free.
2) if the noble gave the serf permission, it could stop working on the land
le reddit
A serf is an unfree medieval peasant who owes labor services on a manor. It is important to understand that serfs are NOT the same thing a slaves. Serfs had their own property, money, and directed much of their own time. A serf could not move way from the manor without permission, and theytypicallyowed about two days of labor each week, but otherwise where able manage their own affairs. A serf could not be sold to another manor, nor could they be deprived of their land holdings in the village fields (if they had such holdings).
They are similar but peasants are free and owe the land they work. Another difference is that serfs didn't have the same rights as peasants did, serfs had less. They had to pay allegiance to the lord of the area. A serf on the other hand did not pay their "dues" so they are forced to stay on the land, but owed allegiance to the lord of the manor, as an agricultural worker.
A cottar was very like a serf, who worked on the land in exchange for a place to live, food, and protection. In ancient times, a distinction was drawn between the two, but it is unclear today what the distinction was. In some places, cottars were freemen, and it may be that the distinction between a cottar and a serf was that the cottar was not bound to the land, and could leave, if he wished, to go somewhere else.
Usually, if a serf wanted to leave the manor, he could find a way to do so fairly easily. We read of serfs buying their freedom. I have no doubt that this happened, but I would be surprised if it happened very often. This is not be cause serfs usually did not have enough money, but because serfs usually had less expensive ways to do things. In some places, serfs were encouraged to leave manors by laws giving them refuge in communities a king wanted more heavily populated. Other laws said that if a serf was missing from a manor for a year, he was regarded as free. In some places, the lords of the manors did things to make the serfs leave of their own accord. This happened because the lords wanted to do such things as appropriate common land for their own use, and did not want to have to put up with the problems that would develop from the serfs. The thing to remember was that the serf was tied to the land, not the lord. The manorial obligations were mutual, between the serf and his lord. The serf had a legal obligation not to move away, but the lord had a legal obligation to allow him to live on the manor. The serf lacked a level of freedom, but he had a guarantee of a job, a home, and a certain amount of protection in times of trouble or famine. When a serf moved away, it freed both the serf and the lord from those obligations. There were times of trouble, when free men and women were glad to give up their freedom in order to gain the security of serfdom. And this was possibly the one thing the kept the serfs most firmly tied to their manors.
If a serf wanted freedom in the late middle ages, then here are two ways that they could escape. Because of the Plague, things were getting more and more difficult for nobility, and, therefore, they had the capacity to just walk off and leave, since so many others were dying, and they'd never be missed. However, most of them just demanded more and more money, instead of leaving. Also: If a serf could escape and live in a city for a day and a year, he would therefore become free.
A serf was a peasant, or farmer, who was "bound to the soil." He was not legally permitted to move off the manor on which he lived. The binding went both ways, however, and was rather more like a contract than like bondage. He could not break the attachment without the consent of the lord, but the lord could not break it without agreement of the serf. A serf had a right to live on the manor, and could not legally be evicted without cause. A serf had a right to farm land according to local custom. This usually meant that he farmed the lord's land one or two days each week, farmed common land a couple of days each week, and had one or two days to farm land assigned to him and his family for their private use. A serf had a right to protection from trouble. This protection was for times of war, social unrest, banditry, and famine. Theoretically, if the serfs could not provide for themselves, their lord had to provide for them. Aside from obligations, which had to be fulfilled according to supervision, a serf was pretty much free.
le reddit
what were two ways in which the siege could have ended
A serf is an unfree medieval peasant who owes labor services on a manor. It is important to understand that serfs are NOT the same thing a slaves. Serfs had their own property, money, and directed much of their own time. A serf could not move way from the manor without permission, and theytypicallyowed about two days of labor each week, but otherwise where able manage their own affairs. A serf could not be sold to another manor, nor could they be deprived of their land holdings in the village fields (if they had such holdings).
A serf is an unfree medieval peasant who owes labor services on a manor. It is important to understand that serfs are NOT the same thing a slaves. Serfs had their own property, money, and directed much of their own time. A serf could not move way from the manor without permission, and theytypicallyowed about two days of labor each week, but otherwise where able manage their own affairs. A serf could not be sold to another manor, nor could they be deprived of their land holdings in the village fields (if they had such holdings).
1st Answer:A serf is a person in a condition of servitude, required to render services to a lord, commonly attached to the lord's land and transferred with it from one owner to another. Prior to that, he or she was known as A HUMAN BEING!2nd Answer:There were a large number of Anglo Saxon terms for serfs of varying status. Among those I have been able to find are the following:Bordar, serfCottar, free peasantGebur, free peasantGeneat, free peasantLaet, serfNieffe, serfPeder, free peasantTheow, slaveThrall, slaveThe difference between serf and slave is that the serf could not be sold and had certain important rights, including rights to land, home, and protection. By contrast, the slave was property and had only the most limited rights. The concept of a serf is derived from the Roman coloni, with the restricted rights enacted by Constantine the Great in 330; the coloni were free farmers who were not permitted to leave their villas in much the same way serfs were tied to their manors. The system was modified and refined about the time of Louis the Pious.The source for the above list seems to be a bit unreliable, as I could see one or two definitions outside this list that were clearly wrong. Nevertheless, it gives some Anglo Saxon words for serfs.
A serf, also know as a villein, was a medieval peasant who owed labor services to the local lord of the manor they lived in. Serfs were not free in the modern sense, in that they could not move away from their lord's major without permission (although sometimes this was arranged by payment or other agreement) but they were notchattelslaves in the modern sense. The typical labor obligation was about two days a week on average, and the remainder of the time a serf could work their own lands (if they held any from the lord) or work for others for pay. Serfs had their own property and money, and could generally manage their own affairs as they chose as long as their labor obligation was met. A prosperous serf even had the option to pay another person to do their labor obligation for them.Like most medieval villagers, serfs primarily did farm work, raising crops, tending gardens, and caring for animals.
They are similar but peasants are free and owe the land they work. Another difference is that serfs didn't have the same rights as peasants did, serfs had less. They had to pay allegiance to the lord of the area. A serf on the other hand did not pay their "dues" so they are forced to stay on the land, but owed allegiance to the lord of the manor, as an agricultural worker.
Boat or air plane
Two ways- one on the first die, and two on the second die, and visa versa.
The two ways of live you could gab lived are, 1: you could be trader or 2: a poor person