If William Wallace had won the Battle of Falkirk in 1298, it could have significantly altered the course of Scottish history. A victory might have bolstered Scottish morale, strengthened Wallace's leadership, and potentially drawn more support from Scottish nobles and commoners alike. This could have led to greater momentum in the struggle for independence from England, possibly delaying or even preventing the eventual dominance of English forces in Scotland. Ultimately, a Falkirk victory might have fostered a more unified and resilient Scottish resistance in the years to come.
cos he won at sterling bridge and was doing a bang up job of running the place Stirling Bridge not Sterling Bridge.
Falkirk won the Scottish Football Association Challenge Cup in 1957.
Bad things.
If the Spanish won the Spanish American war, Cubans would not be independent and they would still be part of Spain.
the gladiators would be granted freedom if he was a slave
English King Edward I won the Battle of Falkirk.
The only battle Wallace won was the Battle of Stirling Bridge, 11th September 1297. The following year, at Falkirk, he lost and had to continue using guerrilla tactics until his betrayal in 1305.
William Wallace fought in two major battles the Battle Of Stirling Bridge which he won and Battle Of Falkirk but also was in several small battles due to using guerrilla warfare
cos he won at sterling bridge and was doing a bang up job of running the place Stirling Bridge not Sterling Bridge.
The team that won the SFA cup in 1913 was Falkirk.
Falkirk won the Scottish Football Association Challenge Cup in 1957.
Things would be very bad
the world would be a better place
i dont no
Bad things.
Kilmarnock FC won the 1997 Scottish Cup. They beat Falkirk FC in the final held at Ibrox Stadium with Paul Wright scoring the winning goal.
Americans would have cool accents haha :)