Attila the Hun was poised to attack Rome in 452 AD, but his invasion was halted by a diplomatic mission led by Pope Leo I. The Pope is said to have met Attila outside the city and persuaded him to withdraw, possibly through a combination of negotiation and the threat of divine retribution. This encounter, along with the potential for famine and the strength of the Roman defenses, contributed to Attila's decision to turn back. Consequently, Rome was spared from destruction, and Attila retreated to his territory in the East.
The pope (I don't remember his name) said that if Attila were to sack Rome, he would be ex-communicated from the church. Since Attila was a devout Christian, and did not want to be sent to hell, he did not attack Rome.
Leo I, Pope who convinced Attila to turn away from Rome without attacking. Check out DoobieBurnin.com
Pope St. Leo I - The Great. Pope from September 29, 440 to his death November 10, 461. In 452, when the King of the Huns, Attila, invaded Italy and threatened Rome, Emperor Valentinian III sent Pope Leo and two high government officials to negotiate with Attila and convince him not to attack and plunder Rome. They were successful. Attila was so impressed by Leo that he withdrew. Unfortunately Leo's intercession could not prevent the sack of the city by the Vandals in 455, but murder and arson were repressed by his influence. .
In 445, their huge empire was ruled solely by Attila. Organizing the conquered tribes as allies Attila crossed the Danube and besieged Constaniople. Then he turned westward and attacked Gaul where he was temporarily defeated by a combined Roman-Visigothic force. Not showing any real signs of defeat, he instead turned eastward and destroyed Milan. As he was preparing to attack Constaniople again, Attila suddenly died of a nosebleed.
Hannibal brought a knife to attack Rome. This is from a love story.
Rome kept paying Attila to not attack rome.if they refused to pay then he will destroy rome.
He did attack Eastern rome, not the western
Attila was leading the Huns into the Western half of the Roman Empire to attack Rome in 452, when Pope Leo I rode out alone and talked to Attila, persuading him to turn back and not sack Rome. Attila was leading the Huns into the Western half of the Roman Empire to attack Rome in 452, when Pope Leo I rode out alone and talked to Attila, persuading him to turn back and not sack Rome.
Attila is the leader of the Huns, but he did not attack first the Visogoths did.
The one thing that kept Attila the Hun from marching into Rome was the diplomatic intervention by Pope Leo I. In 452 AD, Pope Leo met with Attila and persuaded him to turn back, possibly through a combination of negotiation and the threat of divine retribution. Additionally, the Romans were preparing for a potential siege, which may have contributed to Attila's decision to retreat. This encounter marked a significant moment in the history of the Western Roman Empire.
Pope Saint Leo I, the Great
The pope (I don't remember his name) said that if Attila were to sack Rome, he would be ex-communicated from the church. Since Attila was a devout Christian, and did not want to be sent to hell, he did not attack Rome.
Attila died on the Danube River.
No one knows for sure, but whatever he said to Attila convinced him to not sack Rome.
Leo I, Pope who convinced Attila to turn away from Rome without attacking. Check out DoobieBurnin.com
Attila decided to spare Rome because the Romans payed them an annual 2,100 (about 678 kilograms) of gold and the Roman feare Attila and his army (the Huns)Attila did not actually spare Rome. He spared Constantinople. His raids were on the Eastern Roman Empire, not the western one.
Attila was a barbarian invader and Pope Leo convinced him not to sack Rome.