In 445, their huge empire was ruled solely by Attila. Organizing the conquered tribes as allies Attila crossed the Danube and besieged Constaniople. Then he turned westward and attacked Gaul where he was temporarily defeated by a combined Roman-Visigothic force. Not showing any real signs of defeat, he instead turned eastward and destroyed Milan. As he was preparing to attack Constaniople again, Attila suddenly died of a nosebleed.
Leo I, Pope who convinced Attila to turn away from Rome without attacking. Check out DoobieBurnin.com
The pope (I don't remember his name) said that if Attila were to sack Rome, he would be ex-communicated from the church. Since Attila was a devout Christian, and did not want to be sent to hell, he did not attack Rome.
eating children and destroying every thing we love
Attila the Hun was poised to attack Rome in 452 AD, but his invasion was halted by a diplomatic mission led by Pope Leo I. The Pope is said to have met Attila outside the city and persuaded him to withdraw, possibly through a combination of negotiation and the threat of divine retribution. This encounter, along with the potential for famine and the strength of the Roman defenses, contributed to Attila's decision to turn back. Consequently, Rome was spared from destruction, and Attila retreated to his territory in the East.
Divide and concour baby
Attila died on the Danube River.
Rome kept paying Attila to not attack rome.if they refused to pay then he will destroy rome.
No one knows for sure, but whatever he said to Attila convinced him to not sack Rome.
Attila.
Attila was leading the Huns into the Western half of the Roman Empire to attack Rome in 452, when Pope Leo I rode out alone and talked to Attila, persuading him to turn back and not sack Rome. Attila was leading the Huns into the Western half of the Roman Empire to attack Rome in 452, when Pope Leo I rode out alone and talked to Attila, persuading him to turn back and not sack Rome.
Leo I, Pope who convinced Attila to turn away from Rome without attacking. Check out DoobieBurnin.com
Attila decided to spare Rome because the Romans payed them an annual 2,100 (about 678 kilograms) of gold and the Roman feare Attila and his army (the Huns)Attila did not actually spare Rome. He spared Constantinople. His raids were on the Eastern Roman Empire, not the western one.
Attila was a barbarian invader and Pope Leo convinced him not to sack Rome.
Attila is the leader of the Huns, but he did not attack first the Visogoths did.
Attila owned the sword of God of war, same as happened to the ancient rome, when divine sword was somehow sent from sky to rome priests. After that romes never lost any battle. The origin of Attila's sword is unknown but according to legend, it was found by a cow that cut her leg, the shepherd followed through the bloody footprints of cow and reached the place where cow cut her leg, that was the scythe magical sword, shepherd gave it as a gift to Attila, now onwards Attila understood that he was chosen by the sky to rule the territory that was ruled by scythe nomads before. (Scythe conquered africa, eurasia, what is now turkey -hittits, all asia) Attila didn't invade to africa but compensated it by conquering europe.
The pope (I don't remember his name) said that if Attila were to sack Rome, he would be ex-communicated from the church. Since Attila was a devout Christian, and did not want to be sent to hell, he did not attack Rome.
He did attack Eastern rome, not the western