The first emperor that wasted money in the roman empire was Marcus Aurelius because the economy was bad by the inflation of prices.
In pre-mechanical transport era, communication and movement of armies was slow and difficult. So they split the Empire into four to give two emperors and two caesars more manageable quotas.
By splitting the Empire into four parts, under two emperors and two caesars, to make such a large area in a pre-electronic and pre-mechanical transport era, manageable.
It began in 753 B.C. The Roman Empire divided into two factions: The Roman Empire (west) and the Byzantine Empire (East) . The Roman Empire ended in 476 A.D. and the Byzantine Empire, in 1453 A.D.
There was a split between two parts of Rome. The Eastern and the Western parts. Thinking about it, there were two emperors when the Roman Empire fell. The emperor for the Eastern part of Rome was Romulus Augustus . And the The emperor for the Western part of Rome was Odoacer.
The two emperors who tried to restore order in the Roman Empire were Diocletian and Constantine I (or the Great).
The first emperor that wasted money in the roman empire was Marcus Aurelius because the economy was bad by the inflation of prices.
In pre-mechanical transport era, communication and movement of armies was slow and difficult. So they split the Empire into four to give two emperors and two caesars more manageable quotas.
Emperor Diocletian, who created a tetrarchy to more effectively govern the Roman world. It consisted of two senior emperors (augustii) and two junior emperors (caesars), with the western capital based in Rome and the eastern capital in what would be Constantinople.
By splitting the Empire into four parts, under two emperors and two caesars, to make such a large area in a pre-electronic and pre-mechanical transport era, manageable.
It began in 753 B.C. The Roman Empire divided into two factions: The Roman Empire (west) and the Byzantine Empire (East) . The Roman Empire ended in 476 A.D. and the Byzantine Empire, in 1453 A.D.
Constantine split the Roman Empire into the Holy Roman Empire and the Byzantine Empire. It should be noted however that the emperor Diocletian (284-305 AD ) made this easier as he was the first to divide the empire into two parts, a western and eastern empire to be ruled separately. The emperors who followed Constantine, Julian and Theodosius I, made permanent the division of the Roman Empire into an eastern and western half.
There was a split between two parts of Rome. The Eastern and the Western parts. Thinking about it, there were two emperors when the Roman Empire fell. The emperor for the Eastern part of Rome was Romulus Augustus . And the The emperor for the Western part of Rome was Odoacer.
Constantine did not reunite the Roman Empire. The Roman empire was never split. Emperor Diocletian had created the tetrarchy (role by four) in 286. This was a system of co-emperorship with four co-emperors. Two of them were senior emperors (Augusti) in charge of the eastern part of the empire (Diocletian) and the western part of the empire (Maximian). The other two were junior emperors subordinated to the senior ones and in charge of the defence of the troubled frontier areas of the river Rhine in the west and the river Danube in the east. These were administrative and defence reform of a a single empire. The terms Western Roman Empire and Eastern Roman Empire have been coined by historians. The Romans had only one term Roman Empire. Diocletian stressed that the Roman Empire was indivisible. Constantine started as a co-emperor and became sole emperor in 324 after wining two civil wars, one against a usurper (Maxentius) an one against co-emperor Licinius.
In pre-mechanical transport era, communication and movement of armies was slow and difficult. So they split the Empire into four to give two emperors and two caesars more manageable quotas.
20-25, it meant a new emperor every 2-3 years. All of them had been assassinated or died in a battle but two.
The Hily Roman Empire was a hotchpotch of nearly two hundred states many of which, such as city-states and bishoprics were very small. They all cherished their autonomy. The princes of the big states and the church were very powerful and often opposed the emperors. Moreover, the emperors were elected by seven Prince-Electors led by the bishop of Mainz whoi was th Archchancellor of Germany.