In order to properly answer this question, it's important to provide some background on Illinois, the Democrat & Republican parties along with some background information on the candidates.
It has always been clear the Abraham Lincoln was personally against slavery. His own words in speeches he made in the 1858 senatorial race with Stephan Douglas made that clear. From the view of political science the important question is what the two candidates would do as public office holders regarding the issue. In an election campaign, it often comes to a point where it seems a candidate "flip -flops" on an issue and newspapers and the opponents such a candidate will point this out. To be fair, many things said in a campaign are taken out of context and in other cases the offending candidate will simply retract the flip -flop statement and clarify his or her position on an issue.
The 1858 senatorial race in Illinois deserves close attention because the two major candidates are "stand - out " figures in US history. One, Stephan Douglas was the incumbent seeking re-election. Douglas had already made himself an important political force in the Nation by the roles he played in the Missouri Compromise and in the Kansas - Nebraska Act, among other national issues. The State of Illinois was an important one from a national political standpoint. It had a large population and contained the large city of Chicago. Political campaigns in this State required candidates to understand the "lay of the land" in a manner of speaking. And they needed to understand & give support to the party that had nominated them.
One point is clear about the State of Illinois, it was a State that valued itself as a "White State". Some years before the election of 1858, a poll was taken regarding the policies that voters had regarding Afro - Americans. In that poll 70% of Illinois voters would support a amendment to the Illinois State Constitution making it illegal for Afro Americans from living there. (It needs to be remembered that slavery was legal in the USA at the time)
The Republican Party was a newly created one when the Whig Party dissolved. In Illinois, it was a mixture of anti slavery politics and one that favored evangelical Christianity. The rallying cry of the Republicans in Illinois was "The Two Despotisms - Catholicism and Slavery". The Party was sure that each of the two mentioned items were a threat to democracy.
Candidates have to be practical. Lincoln's campaign catch phrase, he took from The Bible and specifically from Matthew 12:25. This is frequently left out of discussions about Lincoln. But, and it's a big but, the Republican Party was a ferociously Protestant. So quoting scripture as a means to gather support was sensible. During the campaign, Lincoln stated that as a senator, he would favor and promote policies that would prevent the expansion of slavery and reduce it where it already exisited.
Lincoln stated that supporting Douglas was affirming the nationalism of slavery. On more than one occasion, Lincoln implied that Douglas was part of a Slave Power conspiracy.
Research for decades have been done on Stephan Douglas because of the major impact this man had on American politics in the middle of the 19th century. Scholars from prominent universities, to this day, debate Douglas personal view of slavery. On the political position, not the personal one, Douglas stated in his campaign that he would remain and continue to keep his view of "popular sovereignty" on the slavery issue. This meant that the voters of a State or a territory should vote on whether they wanted a legal slavery policy or to vote to ban slavery.
So in 1858 it's clear that Lincoln, if elected would try to prevent slavery from spreading and help to abolish it where it already existed. Douglas remained in his position of "let the voters decide".
It should be noted that Douglas won a narrow victory. Whether each candidates' view on slavery was a deciding factor is not known.
Stephen Douglas's speeches, particularly those during the Lincoln-Douglas debates, emphasized popular sovereignty, the idea that the residents of a territory should determine whether to allow slavery. He argued against the federal government's intervention in state affairs and promoted the notion that each state or territory should have the right to make its own laws. Additionally, Douglas sought to appeal to both Northern and Southern interests, advocating for a compromise on the issue of slavery while maintaining the Union's integrity. His speeches often highlighted the importance of democracy and the principle of self-governance.
The subject of the 1850 Fugitive Slave Act was a topic in the series of debates between Lincoln and Douglas. They saw the act as part of a hard fought debate that gave birth to the 1850 Missouri Compromise. Lincoln, was also sensitive about leaning to close to the Republican abolitionists . Each of them also saw slavery as an institution that history itself would dissolve. With that in mind, creating more controversy over the act would not help the nation as a whole.
No, at the end of all seven debates between the two men, Douglas beat Lincoln in the election to retain his Illinois senate seat. While it can be said that each man made important points, Senator Douglas had the edge having been the incumbent candidate.
It was one topic, but certainly not the only one. First, it is worth noting that there were seven debates (and for modern students, accustomed to seeing candidates give one minute responses to questions, each candidate spoke for as long as an hour, before giving way to his opponent). As for Manifest Destiny, the belief that America had both the right and the duty to expand and take over more territory, this was indeed a point of contention between the candidates: Douglas generally supported the idea, while Lincoln generally did not. But most historians will tell you the main topic for the debates was the controversy over slavery-- especially whether the spread of slavery should be limited by the federal government, or whether the individual states should be allowed to make the decision to permit it or not.
Senator Stephen Douglas proposed that the issue of slavery in Kansas and Nebraska be settled by the principle of popular sovereignty. This meant that the settlers of each territory would decide for themselves whether to allow slavery or not, rather than having Congress make that determination. Douglas believed this approach would reduce sectional conflict and allow for westward expansion. However, this led to significant violence and strife, particularly in Kansas, as pro- and anti-slavery factions clashed.
The principal topic of the Lincoln-Douglas debates was slavery. Specifically, Lincoln thought that all the territories (the parts of the United States that were not yet States) should be free of slavery, and that eventually, the federal government should outlaw slavery everywhere in the U.S., while Douglas thought that each territory should decide for itself whether it wanted to allow slavery or not.
Abraham Lincoln believed that slavery was morally wrong and sought to prevent its expansion into new territories, while Stephen Douglas believed in popular sovereignty, allowing each state or territory to decide for itself whether to allow slavery. Lincoln's ultimate goal was to eventually abolish slavery throughout the nation, whereas Douglas prioritized maintaining the peace and unity of the country.
The principal topic of the Lincoln-Douglas debates was slavery. Specifically, Lincoln thought that all the territories (the parts of the United States that were not yet States) should be free of slavery, and that eventually, the federal government should outlaw slavery everywhere in the U.S., while Douglas thought that each territory should decide for itself whether it wanted to allow slavery or not.
Abraham Lincoln and Stephen A. Douglas debated each other during the Illinois Senate race in 1858. The series of debates, known as the Lincoln-Douglas debates, highlighted their differing views on slavery. Although Lincoln gained national recognition from the debates, Douglas ultimately won the Senate seat.
Lincoln believed that slavery was morally wrong and should not be expanded to new territories, while Douglas argued for popular sovereignty, allowing each state or territory to decide for themselves whether to allow slavery. Lincoln also believed that the Declaration of Independence's principle that "all men are created equal" applied to all individuals, regardless of race, while Douglas did not hold the same view.
Abraham Lincoln said that slavery could exist in the United States if it did not spread. That means that the states that had slaves could keep them, but any new state added to the union could not have slavery. Stephan A Douglas believed that slavery was wrong and that it should be abolished from all states now and in the future. Bottom Line: Lincoln= current slave holding states have slaves. All new states have no slaves. Douglas= no slaves what so ever.
Douglas was accused by Lincoln. Lincoln argued in his House Divided Speech that Douglas was part of a conspiracy to nationalize slavery. Lincoln said that ending the Missouri Compromise ban on slavery in Kansas and Nebraska was the first step in this direction, and that the Dred Scott decision was another step in the direction of spreading slavery into Northern territories. Lincoln expressed the fear that the next Dred Scott decision would make Illinois a slave state. It should be noted that the two men held no personal animosity towards each other.
Neither Lincoln nor Douglas supported slavery. The difference was that Lincoln and the Republican Party was dedicated to have slavery in the US abolished. Douglas believed that the people in each state should decide the slavery issue. His policy was called popular sovereignty.
The Illinois seat was open in the US Senate and Lincoln (Republican) And Douglas (Democrat) were running against each other for said seat.Both Stephen A. Douglas and Abraham Lincoln were campaigning for one of the two United States Senator seats from Illinois in 1858.They participated in a total of seven debates across the state.Issues in the debates ranged from states' rights to the spread of slavery into the expanding territories.
Yes. The Supreme Court had declared that slavery was legal in every state of the Union. Stephen Douglas said that the people of each new state should vote whether it should be a slave-state or free soil, and pass local legislation in line with their verdict. The people of Illinois agreed with this idea, and Douglas got the senatorial seat over Lincoln.
The candidates in the 1860 presidential election were Abraham Lincoln who was a republican and John C. Breckinridge who was a Southern Democratic. John Bell and Stephen Douglas were also candidates. Both Lincoln and Douglas wanted to end slavery.
The Dred Scott verdict of 1857, which ruled that slavery was legal in every state of the Union. The Lincoln-Douglas debates of 1858, in which Stephen Douglas successfully argued that the people of each state could outlaw slavery if they wished. (Douglas won his senate seat over Lincoln). The John Brown raid, which convinced the South that Abolitionists were trying to encourage an armed uprising of slaves.