The Diadochi (Or successors) to the Alexandrian Empire were three of Alexanders former generals named Perdiccas , Craterus amd Antipater .
(Lower ranking officers who also vied for power were Ptolemy I Soter , Lysimachus , Peucestas , Peithon and Leonnatus .)
There were just two basic factors that led to the breakup of Alexanders's empire.One was his neglect to appoint an heir and the second one was his deathbed statement that the empire should go to "the strongest". This inane directive was an open invitation to his generals for civil war.There were just two basic factors that led to the breakup of Alexanders's empire.One was his neglect to appoint an heir and the second one was his deathbed statement that the empire should go to "the strongest". This inane directive was an open invitation to his generals for civil war.There were just two basic factors that led to the breakup of Alexanders's empire.One was his neglect to appoint an heir and the second one was his deathbed statement that the empire should go to "the strongest". This inane directive was an open invitation to his generals for civil war.There were just two basic factors that led to the breakup of Alexanders's empire.One was his neglect to appoint an heir and the second one was his deathbed statement that the empire should go to "the strongest". This inane directive was an open invitation to his generals for civil war.There were just two basic factors that led to the breakup of Alexanders's empire.One was his neglect to appoint an heir and the second one was his deathbed statement that the empire should go to "the strongest". This inane directive was an open invitation to his generals for civil war.There were just two basic factors that led to the breakup of Alexanders's empire.One was his neglect to appoint an heir and the second one was his deathbed statement that the empire should go to "the strongest". This inane directive was an open invitation to his generals for civil war.There were just two basic factors that led to the breakup of Alexanders's empire.One was his neglect to appoint an heir and the second one was his deathbed statement that the empire should go to "the strongest". This inane directive was an open invitation to his generals for civil war.There were just two basic factors that led to the breakup of Alexanders's empire.One was his neglect to appoint an heir and the second one was his deathbed statement that the empire should go to "the strongest". This inane directive was an open invitation to his generals for civil war.There were just two basic factors that led to the breakup of Alexanders's empire.One was his neglect to appoint an heir and the second one was his deathbed statement that the empire should go to "the strongest". This inane directive was an open invitation to his generals for civil war.
His generals split it up and continued to fight over the spoils. This settled down in the longer term to the Hellenistic kingdoms of Macedon, Syria and Egypt, with some other minor ones from time to time. They were progressively swallowed up in an expanding Roman empire.
His generals after his death divided the empire up between them.
But it did. It was unavoidable as his generals fought over the spoils and cut out their own kingdoms.
After his death his generals divided the empire and began to fight over their shares.
When Alexander died he left no clear successor so his generals split it up into what we mow call the Hellenistic kingdoms. These finally settled out into Syria, Egypt and Macedonia.
There were just two basic factors that led to the breakup of Alexanders's empire.One was his neglect to appoint an heir and the second one was his deathbed statement that the empire should go to "the strongest". This inane directive was an open invitation to his generals for civil war.There were just two basic factors that led to the breakup of Alexanders's empire.One was his neglect to appoint an heir and the second one was his deathbed statement that the empire should go to "the strongest". This inane directive was an open invitation to his generals for civil war.There were just two basic factors that led to the breakup of Alexanders's empire.One was his neglect to appoint an heir and the second one was his deathbed statement that the empire should go to "the strongest". This inane directive was an open invitation to his generals for civil war.There were just two basic factors that led to the breakup of Alexanders's empire.One was his neglect to appoint an heir and the second one was his deathbed statement that the empire should go to "the strongest". This inane directive was an open invitation to his generals for civil war.There were just two basic factors that led to the breakup of Alexanders's empire.One was his neglect to appoint an heir and the second one was his deathbed statement that the empire should go to "the strongest". This inane directive was an open invitation to his generals for civil war.There were just two basic factors that led to the breakup of Alexanders's empire.One was his neglect to appoint an heir and the second one was his deathbed statement that the empire should go to "the strongest". This inane directive was an open invitation to his generals for civil war.There were just two basic factors that led to the breakup of Alexanders's empire.One was his neglect to appoint an heir and the second one was his deathbed statement that the empire should go to "the strongest". This inane directive was an open invitation to his generals for civil war.There were just two basic factors that led to the breakup of Alexanders's empire.One was his neglect to appoint an heir and the second one was his deathbed statement that the empire should go to "the strongest". This inane directive was an open invitation to his generals for civil war.There were just two basic factors that led to the breakup of Alexanders's empire.One was his neglect to appoint an heir and the second one was his deathbed statement that the empire should go to "the strongest". This inane directive was an open invitation to his generals for civil war.
His generals split it up and continued to fight over the spoils. This settled down in the longer term to the Hellenistic kingdoms of Macedon, Syria and Egypt, with some other minor ones from time to time. They were progressively swallowed up in an expanding Roman empire.
His generals after his death divided the empire up between them.
He died of a fever. It is unknown whether this was a natural event or whether it was induced by poisoning. His empire was divided up by this generals, who fought over the spoils. It eventually settled down to the separate kingdoms (we call them today the Hellenistic kingdoms) of Macedonia, Egypt, Syria-Mesopotamia and Pergamon, which were subsequently incorporated into the expanding Roman Empire.
He had not nominated an heir by the time of his premature death (32) and hs generals carved up his empire amongst them.
He didn't. It took him ten years to conquer, and then he died. His generals succeeded him, and split the empire up into kingdoms of their own.
But it did. It was unavoidable as his generals fought over the spoils and cut out their own kingdoms.
After his death his generals divided the empire and began to fight over their shares.
He didn't. It took him ten years to conquer, and then he died. His generals succeeded him, and split the empire up into kingdoms of their own.
Alexander left no heir, so there was no firm leadership. There was bickering and warfare between his generals who divided up the empire.
His generals split up the empire and formed their own kingdoms (today we call them the Hellenistic Kingdoms).