People of all states could decide if they wanted slavery withing their borders.
A+Ls: The supreme court declared scott was a free man
Which statement best describes the Dred Scott v. Sanford Supreme Court decision?
In the Supreme Court.
The US Supreme Court declared the Missouri Compromiseunconstitutional because he thought Congress had overstepped its authority by trying regulate slavery in the states. This was in keeping with another part of the Dred Scott decision that held slaves were the property of their owners (not citizens), and it was therefore unconstitutional under the Fifth Amendment to deprive an owner of his property without Due Process of law.Case Citation:Dred Scott v. Sanford, 60 US 393 (1857)
The Dred Scot v. Sandford, (1857) arguments concluded on February 18, 1857, and the US Supreme Court announced its decision March 6, 1857.Case Citation:Dred Scott v. Sanford, 60 US 393 (1857)
That the Supreme Court decision was both unnecessary and invalid.
Which statement best describes the Dred Scott v. Sanford Supreme Court decision?
Dred Scott v. Sanford
Dred Scott v. Sanford
The Supreme Court declared Scott was a free man
the decision made slavery legal in all us territories that were not yet states
He was the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court in the Dred Scott v. Sanford decision.
The decision made slavery legal in all U.S. territories that were not yet states.
The decision on Dred Scott vs. Sanford was made by the US Supreme Court on March 6, 1857. For all practical purposes, the Court ruled that slavery was legal and that slaves were property.
The Supreme Court decision in Dred Scott v. Sanford outraged Northerners because it ruled that African Americans could not be U.S. citizens and that Congress could not ban slavery in the territories. This decision was seen as a blow to the abolitionist movement and reinforced the perception that the federal government was siding with pro-slavery interests.
The Supreme Court decision in Dred Scott v. Sanford (1857) ruled that African Americans were not citizens and therefore could not sue in federal court. Additionally, the Court declared that the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional, as it violated the Fifth Amendment rights of slave owners by depriving them of their property.
The Supreme Court decision in Dred Scott v. Sanford (1857) ruled that African Americans, whether free or enslaved, were not considered U.S. citizens and therefore could not sue in federal court. The decision also declared the Missouri Compromise unconstitutional, stating that Congress had no authority to prohibit slavery in the territories. This decision fueled tensions leading up to the Civil War.
the decision made slavery legal in all us territories that were not yet states