nobody did
rich and poor
There are ALWAYS more poor people than rich!
Meat fish and grass a and stuff. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I do not think the rich and the poor just ate grass and meat and fish and stuff thats sounds stupid people.... ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The rich had lots and lots and lots and lots and lots of different types of food but the poor did no have so much because they were..... POOR. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SOME KIDS LINKS ON THE SUBJECT: woodlands-junior.kent.sch.uk/homework/tudors/poor.htm
The Rich and Poor wore different clothes , ate different food , played with different toys therefore this means the Rich had more money in the bank account
Hamilton's policies were most favorable to the wealthy. this way, the rich would be more willing to give money to the government, and then the government could use that money to help the poor. this way, everyone benifitted=)
they were more for the rich but poor did still play with dominos
There are more poor people in China than rich people. There might be as many as 500,000 poor people for every "rich" person. China, with a population of MORE than one billion people {1,000,000,000}, has a very skewed wealth distribution. Most countries have more poor people than rich. The only way rich people are able to become rich is by suppressing the poor.
The rich generally have more economic and political power than the poor.
Both cuz rich steal from the richer and poor steals from the rich..
The poor face a scarcity of resources more often than the rich because they have more limited resources (most importantly, money). But everyone's resources are technically limited. The rich have more money than the poor, but if they spend it all or lose it all, they also face scarcity. If there is a scarcity of a product or a natural resource, it will affect both the rich and the poor, but as prices rise for resources high in demand, the rich will have more access to them, until there is no more for anyone: both rich and poor.
Poor people and immigrants did not benefit while large business and rich people did
Both poor and rich had the same taxes, and the poor were getting more poor.
in India, corruption is raising day by day........... all rich becomes more rich, n poor become more poor......
values are not as deeply ingrained and that changing economic opportunities
Your society might look down on poor vs. rich relationships because it is more difficult to appreciate the poor than it is to appreciate the rich. In most societies, it is believed that rich people tend to be more educated and sometimes "better" than poor people.
Not at all. However, the spread between rich and poor is much more pronounced. In the USA or UK or Canada, there are rich people and poor people but generally the rich are reasonably rich and the poor still usually have a roof over their heads, or, even if homeless, are able not to starve because of a welfare state. However, in India the rich tend to be very very rich, whilst the poor are very very poor - and there are a lot more poor people than in western countries, so, on average, India can be thought of as a poor country although there are many living there who are very rich.
Poverty makes poor more n more poor as they can not afford basic needs .On the other side rich remain rich. This create inequality in India .Also the income as well as standard of living of poor and rich is unequal.