values are not as deeply ingrained and that changing economic opportunities
it has helped reduce the burden of poverty
what is a vicious circle of poverty show it or explain from both demand and supply sides
Poverty is a curse upon humanity because it causes great suffering.
The peasantry, or serfs, benefited the least from feudalism. They were bound to the land and subject to the will of their lords, facing heavy taxation and labor obligations with minimal rights or social mobility. While they provided essential agricultural labor that sustained the feudal system, they received little in return, often living in poverty and under harsh conditions. Their lack of power and resources left them at the bottom of the feudal hierarchy.
That poverty was to blame for their condition $ JCM$
They did not have money in addition to the existence of extreme poverty
Education would help poverty because the more education you have, the more likely you'll be to go to college, and after college get a job. If more people had jobs there would be less people in poverty.
No, many rural areas are prosperous. There is no direct synonym for rurality, which is the state of rural existence or location.
The Renaissance was not an end to poverty; rather, it marked a period of cultural and intellectual revival that primarily benefited the wealthy and educated classes. While it spurred advancements in art, science, and literature, socioeconomic disparities remained significant. Many people, particularly in rural areas, continued to experience poverty. Thus, while the Renaissance contributed to some economic growth, it did not eradicate poverty.
To explain further - I need some policies that have attempted to reduce poverty in the UK but have not been successful. Please comment with any ideas you have. Thank you!
This phrase suggests being aware of the suffering and struggles faced by those who are in need or experiencing poverty. It implies understanding the challenges and difficulties that come with living in poverty or lacking basic resources.
Utzel calling his daughter Poverty is fitting because he sees her as a burden and a limitation in his life. Naming her Poverty reflects his negative view of her existence and his perception of her as something that brings hardship and lack into his life. It reveals his resentment towards her and his deep-seated dissatisfaction with his circumstances.