A Roman century was commanded by a centurion.
A Roman centurion was a military officer. There were eleven grades or ranks of centurion so the title "centurion" covered a lot of officers. Incidentally, a centurion of the lowest rank commanded a "century" of 80 men, not the 100 men that is erroneously thought to have made up the century.A Roman centurion was a military officer. There were eleven grades or ranks of centurion so the title "centurion" covered a lot of officers. Incidentally, a centurion of the lowest rank commanded a "century" of 80 men, not the 100 men that is erroneously thought to have made up the century.A Roman centurion was a military officer. There were eleven grades or ranks of centurion so the title "centurion" covered a lot of officers. Incidentally, a centurion of the lowest rank commanded a "century" of 80 men, not the 100 men that is erroneously thought to have made up the century.A Roman centurion was a military officer. There were eleven grades or ranks of centurion so the title "centurion" covered a lot of officers. Incidentally, a centurion of the lowest rank commanded a "century" of 80 men, not the 100 men that is erroneously thought to have made up the century.A Roman centurion was a military officer. There were eleven grades or ranks of centurion so the title "centurion" covered a lot of officers. Incidentally, a centurion of the lowest rank commanded a "century" of 80 men, not the 100 men that is erroneously thought to have made up the century.A Roman centurion was a military officer. There were eleven grades or ranks of centurion so the title "centurion" covered a lot of officers. Incidentally, a centurion of the lowest rank commanded a "century" of 80 men, not the 100 men that is erroneously thought to have made up the century.A Roman centurion was a military officer. There were eleven grades or ranks of centurion so the title "centurion" covered a lot of officers. Incidentally, a centurion of the lowest rank commanded a "century" of 80 men, not the 100 men that is erroneously thought to have made up the century.A Roman centurion was a military officer. There were eleven grades or ranks of centurion so the title "centurion" covered a lot of officers. Incidentally, a centurion of the lowest rank commanded a "century" of 80 men, not the 100 men that is erroneously thought to have made up the century.A Roman centurion was a military officer. There were eleven grades or ranks of centurion so the title "centurion" covered a lot of officers. Incidentally, a centurion of the lowest rank commanded a "century" of 80 men, not the 100 men that is erroneously thought to have made up the century.
100 Wrong! this is a classic answer but it is actually 80 men who made up a century. The resources I have do say both answers and nine out of ten of them most say it was 80 men.
The Roman officer rank system was different than today's. There was not an officer rank designated as commander of a cohort. Effectively a cohort was led by the commander of its first century. The rank of the officers also varied depending on the cohort they belonged to.The Roman legion had ten cohorts. Cohorts 2 to 10 had six standard centuries and cohort 1 had five double size centuries. The first cohort had five primi ordines who commanded the five centuries of the first cohort. The senior among them was the primus pilus who commanded the first century, and therefore was like a commander of the cohort. The pilus prior was the commander of the first century of cohorts 2 to 10. The other five centuries were commanded by centurions. The pilus prior and the centurions of cohorts 6 to 10 were of lower rank than those of cohort 2 to 5.
There was no Roman officer in command of 100 men. There is a misconception that a centurion commanded 100 men, but this is false. The Roman army had no unit consisting of 100. An officer called a centurion, commanded a century which was 80 men. According to some military historians, the title "centurion" did not originate from the root word for one hundred, centum, but from the root word centuria, which was the voting assembly. The army kept this term, in my opinion, for the sole purpose of confusing students 2000 years in the future.
After the fall of the Roman republic came the principate, or as it is commonly called the "empire", because the leader was the "Imperator", the one who commanded.
A military officer who commanded a minor division of the Roman army; a captain of a century.
A Roman centurion was a military officer. There were eleven grades or ranks of centurion so the title "centurion" covered a lot of officers. Incidentally, a centurion of the lowest rank commanded a "century" of 80 men, not the 100 men that is erroneously thought to have made up the century.A Roman centurion was a military officer. There were eleven grades or ranks of centurion so the title "centurion" covered a lot of officers. Incidentally, a centurion of the lowest rank commanded a "century" of 80 men, not the 100 men that is erroneously thought to have made up the century.A Roman centurion was a military officer. There were eleven grades or ranks of centurion so the title "centurion" covered a lot of officers. Incidentally, a centurion of the lowest rank commanded a "century" of 80 men, not the 100 men that is erroneously thought to have made up the century.A Roman centurion was a military officer. There were eleven grades or ranks of centurion so the title "centurion" covered a lot of officers. Incidentally, a centurion of the lowest rank commanded a "century" of 80 men, not the 100 men that is erroneously thought to have made up the century.A Roman centurion was a military officer. There were eleven grades or ranks of centurion so the title "centurion" covered a lot of officers. Incidentally, a centurion of the lowest rank commanded a "century" of 80 men, not the 100 men that is erroneously thought to have made up the century.A Roman centurion was a military officer. There were eleven grades or ranks of centurion so the title "centurion" covered a lot of officers. Incidentally, a centurion of the lowest rank commanded a "century" of 80 men, not the 100 men that is erroneously thought to have made up the century.A Roman centurion was a military officer. There were eleven grades or ranks of centurion so the title "centurion" covered a lot of officers. Incidentally, a centurion of the lowest rank commanded a "century" of 80 men, not the 100 men that is erroneously thought to have made up the century.A Roman centurion was a military officer. There were eleven grades or ranks of centurion so the title "centurion" covered a lot of officers. Incidentally, a centurion of the lowest rank commanded a "century" of 80 men, not the 100 men that is erroneously thought to have made up the century.A Roman centurion was a military officer. There were eleven grades or ranks of centurion so the title "centurion" covered a lot of officers. Incidentally, a centurion of the lowest rank commanded a "century" of 80 men, not the 100 men that is erroneously thought to have made up the century.
There is no such thing as a century of 100 men in the Roman army. A century consisted of 80 men. It was commanded by a centurion. Do not be misled by the word "century". It as nothing to do with the number 100 in army terms.There is no such thing as a century of 100 men in the Roman army. A century consisted of 80 men. It was commanded by a centurion. Do not be misled by the word "century". It as nothing to do with the number 100 in army terms.There is no such thing as a century of 100 men in the Roman army. A century consisted of 80 men. It was commanded by a centurion. Do not be misled by the word "century". It as nothing to do with the number 100 in army terms.There is no such thing as a century of 100 men in the Roman army. A century consisted of 80 men. It was commanded by a centurion. Do not be misled by the word "century". It as nothing to do with the number 100 in army terms.There is no such thing as a century of 100 men in the Roman army. A century consisted of 80 men. It was commanded by a centurion. Do not be misled by the word "century". It as nothing to do with the number 100 in army terms.There is no such thing as a century of 100 men in the Roman army. A century consisted of 80 men. It was commanded by a centurion. Do not be misled by the word "century". It as nothing to do with the number 100 in army terms.There is no such thing as a century of 100 men in the Roman army. A century consisted of 80 men. It was commanded by a centurion. Do not be misled by the word "century". It as nothing to do with the number 100 in army terms.There is no such thing as a century of 100 men in the Roman army. A century consisted of 80 men. It was commanded by a centurion. Do not be misled by the word "century". It as nothing to do with the number 100 in army terms.There is no such thing as a century of 100 men in the Roman army. A century consisted of 80 men. It was commanded by a centurion. Do not be misled by the word "century". It as nothing to do with the number 100 in army terms.
The emporer
Most ancient remains pervail the knowledge that a Roman Centurion could control 100 men.His command would depend on his rank. There were many ranks of "centurion". The lowest ranking centurion commanded a century which was 80 men, contrary to popular belief that a century consisted of 100 men. If he commanded a cohort, he would command 480 men and if he were the "first spear" and commanded the first cohort, he had about 800 men under his command. The camp prefect, who was also a centurion, commanded the entire legion in the absence of the general and senior officers.
The people who commanded the armies and ran the legal system were called Praetors. They were appointed by the Roman government.
The Roman empire ruled Egypt in the second century AD.The Roman empire ruled Egypt in the second century AD.The Roman empire ruled Egypt in the second century AD.The Roman empire ruled Egypt in the second century AD.The Roman empire ruled Egypt in the second century AD.The Roman empire ruled Egypt in the second century AD.The Roman empire ruled Egypt in the second century AD.The Roman empire ruled Egypt in the second century AD.The Roman empire ruled Egypt in the second century AD.
100 Wrong! this is a classic answer but it is actually 80 men who made up a century. The resources I have do say both answers and nine out of ten of them most say it was 80 men.
A Roman soldier that leads a century is called a centurion.
The Roman officer rank system was different than today's. There was not an officer rank designated as commander of a cohort. Effectively a cohort was led by the commander of its first century. The rank of the officers also varied depending on the cohort they belonged to.The Roman legion had ten cohorts. Cohorts 2 to 10 had six standard centuries and cohort 1 had five double size centuries. The first cohort had five primi ordines who commanded the five centuries of the first cohort. The senior among them was the primus pilus who commanded the first century, and therefore was like a commander of the cohort. The pilus prior was the commander of the first century of cohorts 2 to 10. The other five centuries were commanded by centurions. The pilus prior and the centurions of cohorts 6 to 10 were of lower rank than those of cohort 2 to 5.
Since they were Roman legions, they would have been made up of Roman soldiers. However, the auxillaries were generally foreign troops who became Roman citizens after they had served their enlistment time.
The Parthians - defeated the Roman expeditionary force commanded by Crassus in Mesopotamia.