roger sherman
The Great Compromise resolved a conflict about the structure of the legislative branch of the federal government during the Constitutional Convention of 1787. It addressed the disagreement between large states, which favored representation based on population, and small states, which wanted equal representation for each state. The compromise established a bicameral legislature, consisting of the House of Representatives with population-based representation and the Senate with equal representation, ensuring a balance of power between states of varying sizes.
Delegates at the Constitutional Convention faced significant issues that required compromise, notably representation and slavery. The Great Compromise established a bicameral legislature, balancing the interests of both populous and smaller states by creating the House of Representatives and the Senate. Additionally, the Three-Fifths Compromise addressed the contentious issue of slavery by counting enslaved individuals as three-fifths of a person for taxation and representation purposes. These compromises were essential in gaining broader support for the Constitution among the states.
The Great Compromise and the Three-Fifths Compromise sparked intense debate because they addressed the fundamental issues of representation and the balance of power between populous and less populous states, as well as the contentious issue of slavery. The Great Compromise sought to balance the interests of large and small states in Congress, leading to differing perspectives on how representation should be allocated. Meanwhile, the Three-Fifths Compromise attempted to resolve the contentious debate over how enslaved people would be counted for representation and taxation, highlighting deep divisions over slavery and its implications for political power. These compromises were critical in shaping the framework of the U.S. government, making their discussions pivotal to the Constitutional Convention.
How would slaves be counted for in population, voting and taxing. It was chosen that an African American Slave would be counted as 3/5 of a person in terms of taxation and representation.
The Three-Fifths Compromise was a solution during the 1787 Constitutional Convention that addressed the contentious issue of how slaves would be counted for representation and taxation purposes. It stipulated that each enslaved person would be counted as three-fifths of a person, allowing Southern states to increase their representation in Congress while also limiting their tax burdens. This compromise aimed to balance the interests of slaveholding states with those favoring abolition, ultimately facilitating the ratification of the U.S. Constitution. However, it also entrenched the institution of slavery in American politics.
Roger Sherman created the Great Compromise! :)
Roger Sherman
Roger Sherman
The Great Compromise resolved a conflict about the structure of the legislative branch of the federal government during the Constitutional Convention of 1787. It addressed the disagreement between large states, which favored representation based on population, and small states, which wanted equal representation for each state. The compromise established a bicameral legislature, consisting of the House of Representatives with population-based representation and the Senate with equal representation, ensuring a balance of power between states of varying sizes.
The Thee-Fifths Compromise
Yes, the central compromise of the Constitutional Convention, often referred to as the Great Compromise, addressed the balance of power within the federal government by establishing a bicameral legislature. This compromise created the House of Representatives, where representation is based on population, and the Senate, where each state has equal representation. This dual system was designed to balance the interests of populous states with those of smaller states, thereby ensuring a more equitable distribution of power within the federal government.
At the Constitutional Convention of 1787 serious differences about representation were resolved by creating a bicameral legislature.
The Great Compromise, also known as the Connecticut Compromise, addressed the contentious issue of legislative representation during the Constitutional Convention of 1787. The conflict arose between larger states, which favored the Virginia Plan advocating for representation based on population, and smaller states, which supported the New Jersey Plan that called for equal representation regardless of size. The compromise established a bicameral legislature with the House of Representatives based on population and the Senate providing equal representation with two senators from each state. This balanced the interests of both large and small states in the new government framework.
The two main constitutional compromises—the Great Compromise and the Three-Fifths Compromise—addressed sectional differences by balancing representation and addressing slavery. The Great Compromise established a bicameral legislature, giving states equal representation in the Senate while basing House representation on population, which favored populous states. The Three-Fifths Compromise allowed southern states to count three-fifths of their enslaved population for representation purposes, thus giving them more political power while placating northern states concerned about the ethics of slavery. Together, these compromises sought to create a fragile unity among the diverse interests of the northern and southern states.
The 55 delegates at the Constitutional Convention addressed representation and slavery through the Great Compromise and the Three-Fifths Compromise. The Great Compromise established a bicameral legislature with proportional representation in the House based on population and equal representation in the Senate. The Three-Fifths Compromise permitted states to count three-fifths of their enslaved population for both representation and taxation purposes, granting Southern states more political power while still acknowledging the existence of slavery. This delicate balance aimed to placate both Northern and Southern states, though it ultimately enshrined the institution of slavery within the Constitution.
The Virginia Plan, New Jersey Plan, and Great Compromise addressed the issue of representation in the legislative branch of the new government. The Virginia Plan proposed representation based on population, favoring larger states, while the New Jersey Plan called for equal representation for each state, favoring smaller states. The Great Compromise ultimately resolved this conflict by creating a bicameral legislature, with the House of Representatives based on population and the Senate providing equal representation for each state. This compromise was crucial in facilitating the formation of the U.S. Constitution.
William Blount, a delegate from North Carolina, was generally supportive of the Great Compromise during the Constitutional Convention of 1787. The compromise addressed the conflict between large and small states by establishing a bicameral legislature, balancing representation in the Senate with population-based representation in the House. Blount's support for the compromise reflected his interest in ensuring that both state and popular interests were represented in the new government structure. Overall, he saw it as a necessary solution to achieve unity among the states.