The Virginia Plan, New Jersey Plan, and Great Compromise addressed the issue of representation in the legislative branch of the new government. The Virginia Plan proposed representation based on population, favoring larger states, while the New Jersey Plan called for equal representation for each state, favoring smaller states. The Great Compromise ultimately resolved this conflict by creating a bicameral legislature, with the House of Representatives based on population and the Senate providing equal representation for each state. This compromise was crucial in facilitating the formation of the U.S. Constitution.
The Congress called for the Constitutional Convention to address problems in governing the US.
The name of the constitutional convention called to address problems faced by the U.S. under the Articles of Confederation was just that - the Constitutional Convention. Participants included George Washington, James Madison, Alexander Hamilton and others.
The federal government needed to be more powerful.
The delegates to the Constitutional Convention needed to find a way to balance the interests of large and small states, particularly in terms of representation in Congress. They sought to address the concerns of slaveholding states versus free states regarding the counting of slaves for representation and taxation. Additionally, they aimed to balance federal and state powers to ensure an effective yet limited government. Ultimately, they crafted compromises, such as the Great Compromise and the Three-Fifths Compromise, to achieve this balance.
The states that took the lead in advocating for a change in government due to the weaknesses in the Articles of Confederation were Virginia and Massachusetts. Virginia was the first to call for a convention to revise the Articles, which eventually led to the Constitutional Convention. Massachusetts also played a significant role by proposing a series of reforms to address the weaknesses in the existing government.
Yes, the terms "Connecticut Compromise" and "Great Compromise" are appropriate as they both refer to the same agreement that established a bicameral legislature, balancing the interests of large and small states. The term "Three-Fifths Compromise," often labeled a "sectional compromise," accurately reflects the contentious agreement between northern and southern states regarding the counting of enslaved individuals for representation and taxation. Both terms highlight the compromises made to address differing regional interests during the Constitutional Convention.
At the Constitutional Convention, small states sought to ensure their interests were protected in the new federal framework. They were particularly concerned about representation in Congress, fearing that larger states would dominate decisions. To address this, they advocated for equal representation regardless of population, which led to the creation of the Senate, where each state has two senators. This compromise helped balance power between large and small states in the new government structure.
address the issue of population differences among the states
The Great Compromise, also known as the Connecticut Compromise, was created during the Constitutional Convention of 1787 to address the issue of representation in Congress. It established a bicameral legislature, consisting of the House of Representatives, where representation is based on population, and the Senate, where each state has equal representation with two senators. This compromise balanced the interests of both populous and less populous states, ensuring fair representation for all.
During the Constitutional Convention of 1787, delegates made several key compromises to address disagreements between states with large populations and those with smaller ones. The Great Compromise established a bicameral legislature, with the House of Representatives based on population and the Senate granting equal representation to each state. Additionally, the Three-Fifths Compromise allowed states to count three-fifths of their enslaved population for representation and taxation purposes, balancing the interests of slaveholding and non-slaveholding states. These compromises were crucial for achieving consensus and ultimately ratifying the Constitution.
Yes, Jacob Broom participated in the Annapolis Convention held in 1786. He was one of the delegates representing Pennsylvania at the convention, which aimed to address issues related to trade and commerce among the states. The convention ultimately led to the calling of the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia the following year.
Under the Articles the Government was not able to regulate trade and levy taxes. In the Constitution they were given that power.