Sharecropping primarily disadvantaged the sharecroppers themselves, who were often poor, landless farmers, typically African Americans in the South after the Civil War. They faced exploitative contracts that left them in debt to landowners, limiting their economic mobility and keeping them in a cycle of poverty. Additionally, landowners benefited significantly, as they maintained control over land and resources without having to pay fair wages or provide adequate living conditions for the sharecroppers.
Slaves and farmers who asked landowners for land to work would be the least benefit since they would get, usually, indebted to that person.
sharecropping affected African Americans and poor whites.
sharecropping=)
it would benefit them because they would have money so they could have a roof over their heads and earn a living also maybe be near white people and get along
no
Slaves and farmers who asked landowners for land to work would be the least benefit since they would get, usually, indebted to that person.
The families lived on sharecropping land
Slaves and farmers who asked landowners for land to work would be the least benefit since they would get, usually, indebted to that person.
Slaves and farmers who asked landowners for land to work would be the least benefit since they would get, usually, indebted to that person.
sharecropping affected African Americans and poor whites.
Cesar had done sharecropping with his neighbor's.
sharecropping=)
Sharecropping
There is no antonym for sharecropping as far as I know.
You
They were allowed to have part of the final crop, hence the name sharecropping.
Sharecropping was used to keep the land owner in wealth and have workers but still with little pay.