Diocletian.
I'm certainly not portraying myself as an expert of Roman history, but what I remember from my history classes and the multitude of History Channel episodes on Rome, I believe the main reason was that it was the only way to manage what had become a huge empire. It was simply too large and too involved for one person to effectively control.Diocletian decided that the empire was too big for one person to govern so he split the empire in two and instated a co-emperor.
The second triumvirs divided the empire as follows: Lepidus had control of Africa, Octavian had control of Italy and Antony had control of the east.The second triumvirs divided the empire as follows: Lepidus had control of Africa, Octavian had control of Italy and Antony had control of the east.The second triumvirs divided the empire as follows: Lepidus had control of Africa, Octavian had control of Italy and Antony had control of the east.The second triumvirs divided the empire as follows: Lepidus had control of Africa, Octavian had control of Italy and Antony had control of the east.The second triumvirs divided the empire as follows: Lepidus had control of Africa, Octavian had control of Italy and Antony had control of the east.The second triumvirs divided the empire as follows: Lepidus had control of Africa, Octavian had control of Italy and Antony had control of the east.The second triumvirs divided the empire as follows: Lepidus had control of Africa, Octavian had control of Italy and Antony had control of the east.The second triumvirs divided the empire as follows: Lepidus had control of Africa, Octavian had control of Italy and Antony had control of the east.The second triumvirs divided the empire as follows: Lepidus had control of Africa, Octavian had control of Italy and Antony had control of the east.
Diocletian split or divided the empire in order to make it easier to govern, or so he thought.Diocletian split or divided the empire in order to make it easier to govern, or so he thought.Diocletian split or divided the empire in order to make it easier to govern, or so he thought.Diocletian split or divided the empire in order to make it easier to govern, or so he thought.Diocletian split or divided the empire in order to make it easier to govern, or so he thought.Diocletian split or divided the empire in order to make it easier to govern, or so he thought.Diocletian split or divided the empire in order to make it easier to govern, or so he thought.Diocletian split or divided the empire in order to make it easier to govern, or so he thought.Diocletian split or divided the empire in order to make it easier to govern, or so he thought.
By splitting the Empire into four parts, under two emperors and two caesars, to make such a large area in a pre-electronic and pre-mechanical transport era, manageable.
It was the historians of the Middle Ages that first began using the terms eastern and western for parts of the Roman empire. This was not meant to give a false impression, but to clarify their positions and their theories on Roman life.
Diocletian divided the empire in order to make it easier to rule.Diocletian divided the empire in order to make it easier to rule.Diocletian divided the empire in order to make it easier to rule.Diocletian divided the empire in order to make it easier to rule.Diocletian divided the empire in order to make it easier to rule.Diocletian divided the empire in order to make it easier to rule.Diocletian divided the empire in order to make it easier to rule.Diocletian divided the empire in order to make it easier to rule.Diocletian divided the empire in order to make it easier to rule.
I'm certainly not portraying myself as an expert of Roman history, but what I remember from my history classes and the multitude of History Channel episodes on Rome, I believe the main reason was that it was the only way to manage what had become a huge empire. It was simply too large and too involved for one person to effectively control.Diocletian decided that the empire was too big for one person to govern so he split the empire in two and instated a co-emperor.
The second triumvirs divided the empire as follows: Lepidus had control of Africa, Octavian had control of Italy and Antony had control of the east.The second triumvirs divided the empire as follows: Lepidus had control of Africa, Octavian had control of Italy and Antony had control of the east.The second triumvirs divided the empire as follows: Lepidus had control of Africa, Octavian had control of Italy and Antony had control of the east.The second triumvirs divided the empire as follows: Lepidus had control of Africa, Octavian had control of Italy and Antony had control of the east.The second triumvirs divided the empire as follows: Lepidus had control of Africa, Octavian had control of Italy and Antony had control of the east.The second triumvirs divided the empire as follows: Lepidus had control of Africa, Octavian had control of Italy and Antony had control of the east.The second triumvirs divided the empire as follows: Lepidus had control of Africa, Octavian had control of Italy and Antony had control of the east.The second triumvirs divided the empire as follows: Lepidus had control of Africa, Octavian had control of Italy and Antony had control of the east.The second triumvirs divided the empire as follows: Lepidus had control of Africa, Octavian had control of Italy and Antony had control of the east.
Diocletian split or divided the empire in order to make it easier to govern, or so he thought.Diocletian split or divided the empire in order to make it easier to govern, or so he thought.Diocletian split or divided the empire in order to make it easier to govern, or so he thought.Diocletian split or divided the empire in order to make it easier to govern, or so he thought.Diocletian split or divided the empire in order to make it easier to govern, or so he thought.Diocletian split or divided the empire in order to make it easier to govern, or so he thought.Diocletian split or divided the empire in order to make it easier to govern, or so he thought.Diocletian split or divided the empire in order to make it easier to govern, or so he thought.Diocletian split or divided the empire in order to make it easier to govern, or so he thought.
Diocleatin had split the empire into four to make it easier to control. Also he ruled the eastern half of the empire.
By splitting the Empire into four parts, under two emperors and two caesars, to make such a large area in a pre-electronic and pre-mechanical transport era, manageable.
The emperor Diocletian was the one who divided the empire into four parts in order to make it easier to govern.
He divided the empire into two halves and shared his power with a co-emperor
It was the historians of the Middle Ages that first began using the terms eastern and western for parts of the Roman empire. This was not meant to give a false impression, but to clarify their positions and their theories on Roman life.
I think its because That Constantine thought it would be too hard for 1 emperor to rule by himself so he divided the empire into two and sent one of his loyal servants to go rule the western part of Rome.
The Roman Empire was divided into three main sections: the Western Roman Empire, the Eastern Roman Empire (also known as the Byzantine Empire), and the provinces. This division was primarily a response to the vast size of the empire and the challenges of governance, including defense against invasions and administrative efficiency. The division increased vulnerability, as each section could face unique threats and challenges, ultimately contributing to the decline of the Western Roman Empire in the 5th century. The Eastern Empire, however, continued to thrive for centuries after the fall of its western counterpart.
He divided it into provinces and assigned satraps to govern them.