A man how insalved the Jew and Nazis.
A man how insalved the Jew and Nazis.
Aproximatly 6 million Jews hetler killed
It has been theorized that the ideal diet of Hitler (not Hetler) was vegetarianism. Though some theory (which provokes truth) say that he isn't and thus he loved animals. Then, if he loved animals, why does he eat them?
if you lived in the U.S.A our enimes were japan hetler and the natzies (from Germany) and Italy
kayfa sa2adroubou laka elta7iya ... wbinafsel alwaket ana oufakirou kayfa sa2a7kom al3alam ..... - Adolf hetler -
No, Jose Rizal is not the father of Hitler. Jose Rizal was a Filipino nationalist and writer known for his advocacy of Philippine independence, while Hitler was a German dictator and leader of the Nazi Party known for his role in World War II. There is no known connection between the two.
Erik Haaest has written: 'Agent affaeren Hetler' 'Frostknuder' -- subject(s): Campaigns, Frikorps Danmark, Regimental histories, World War, 1939-1945 'Hipofolk' -- subject(s): Biography, Collaborationists, Denmark, History, Lorenzengruppen, Sabotage, Terrorists, World War, 1939-1945 'Frikorpsfolk' -- subject(s): Campaigns, Regimental histories, Waffen-SS, Waffen-SS. Freikorps Danmark, World War, 1939-1945
When it comes down to close range combat, the submachine gun, automatic pistol or shotgun, are all fine weapons. Both military and police operators have been using these weapons for decades with great success. This is almost an impossible question to answer. Efficiency presumably means the ability of the weapon to make someone incapable of fighting in the shortest possible time. This is based on the nature of close combat, where an opponent must ideally be incapacitated instantly for fear that they will have time and opportunity to hit back. Taking this definition there is no easy answer. So much depends on the nature of the opponent, and the overall intention of the assault. The opponent may be on drugs, unawares, wearing body armour, or very weak/strong. The intention may be to incapacitate silently, en masse, permanently or impermanently. You also have the question of your own circumstance. You may not have access to lots of ammunition, money, or weight carrying.In the end, one weapon that will apply in almost any case is the simple sharpened shovel. If speed is the one criteria a high powered taser is likely to be better than any firearm, because it directly stops movement, rather than relying on blood loss and nerve damage.my mechanic seen action in Korea in the Canadian infantry. the canadians were still issued ww1 lee enfield 303 bolt rifles which were useless against a mass Chinese attack.he said that everyone was trying to get hold of a Thompson or the 15 shot m1 carbine.he told me what he used mostly was plenty of grenades due to the shear numbers of Chinese on attack.The Hetler & Koch MP7 is one of the best. It weighs 1.7 Kg and has a range of 200m. It fires 950 rounds per minute and can easily defeat body armour. It can also be fitted with a silencer and a scope. The H&K MP5 is a very accurate and portable sub-machine gun that is used worldwide by the military as well as police forces and is known for its stability however the 9mm round fired by it is underpowered by today's standards.Also there is the fully automatic shotgun and even now in Afghanistan some of are troops are using a newly designed tomahawkThe most ideal weapon depends on the situation. A combatant skilled with a knife may opt to use it to inflict a killing blow or attack unarmoured parts of the enemy, and this is probably as efficient as the user is skilled with the knife. A shotgun can provide a good deal of stopping power at close range, but any compact weapon with jacketed hollow-point rounds would work well at close range.
Music is not related to behavior. There is a tendency to think so, but it doesn't necessarily mean that a person who listens to heavy metal is mean and stupid or if a person listens to Bethoven they are intelligentAs a practising (ie professional!) musician I've thought a lot about this one over the years , and it's my opinion that music IS related to behaviour, in that it can enhance an emotional or psychological state already present or latent. Check out the choice of music chosen for "occasions": State; weddings; funerals; batchelor/hen parties: we choose music to accord with and enhance our mood - don't we? But nothing in my experience has led me to believe that music of any kind could completely change the mind-set of any rational being; NO tunes, NO lyrics are going to lead you anywhere you weren't already longing to go anyway, whether you find your rapport in "classical" music [which was often very seditious and revolutionary in its day anyway! Hey, Beethoven was a renegade, in his life-time!] or in "naughty" rapping. We've all, all, all been there before!I would think that most "suitable" music is chosen simply because it has always been chosen. People who have certain behaviour might listen to certain music because that is what they believe is suitable for that activity, e.g. most people play play pop or rap/hiphop at a disco because that is what is always played at a disco. Music does not change how you behave, but it can amplify behaviour simply because that is what you think when you listen, and you listen because that is what you are thinking/feeling.Answer 2There have been numerous studies to suggest that music can influence behaviour and even health to some extent. There have also been studies on how music can influence the behaviour of children:There was a significant improvement in behaviour and mathematics performance for all the children. The effects were particularly marked for those whose problems were related to constant stimulus-seeking and over-activity. Improvements were also observed in improved co-operation and a reduction in aggression during the lessons immediately following the study.The following extract is taken from a music research study:Research indicates that volume, speed and type of music can have profound effects on product preference, alcohol consumption and spending moneyAnswer 3Music styles are often perceived to affect behavior and personality, but it's often the other way around. More laid back characters often prefer laid back music.It's also affected by the subconcious personality of the individual. E.g. If you are a calm, conservative person, you may like black metal, this can be led by the subconcious desire to let out associated feelings, and to release feelings of anger etc.We all need to feel human every once in a while.Answer 4I saw the results of a recent study that agreed with many others. Music does NOT influence behaviour or mood (although there have been documented cases when the person is mentally insane, such as Charles Manson who interpetted the Beatles song "Hetler Sketler" to mean there was going to be a race war), instead this is reversed. They found althoguh the mood of teh song comes into play, more often a sad person for example will pick songs with sad lyrics (but can vary in genre, whether it is a rock song, a country song, a rap song, a Blues song, or anything of the such).Sad music does not depress someone if they are happy. Vice versa with other emotions.