The states that took the lead in advocating for a change in government due to the weaknesses in the Articles of Confederation were Virginia and Massachusetts. Virginia was the first to call for a convention to revise the Articles, which eventually led to the Constitutional Convention. Massachusetts also played a significant role by proposing a series of reforms to address the weaknesses in the existing government.
No, 9/13 was required to pass a law. However all 13 had to be in agreement to Amend the Articles of Confederation which is why it took years to get rid of the poorly run government.
the articles of confederation and the constitution are both the same because they both are written and the difference is that they tell different things. and i dont know but i just wanted to do something so i took a long shot at it
True. The Articles of Confederation required the approval of all 13 states for ratification, while the U.S. Constitution only required the consent of nine states to become effective. This difference allowed for a more streamlined process in adopting the Constitution compared to the Articles of Confederation.
The meeting held to change the Articles of Confederation was the Constitutional Convention, which took place in Philadelphia in 1787. Delegates from twelve of the thirteen states convened to address the weaknesses of the Articles, ultimately leading to the drafting of the United States Constitution. The Convention aimed to create a stronger federal government while balancing the powers of the states.
The states that took the lead in advocating for a change in government due to the weaknesses in the Articles of Confederation were Virginia and Massachusetts. Virginia was the first to call for a convention to revise the Articles, which eventually led to the Constitutional Convention. Massachusetts also played a significant role by proposing a series of reforms to address the weaknesses in the existing government.
Maryland
he thought that the Articles of Confederation were fine and were decently handled ^^ his view at first. then when he got to the constitutional convention, he saw the flaws/weaknesses in the articles and took on a more anti-fed view.
The Articles of Confederation were adopted by Congress on November 15, 1777. They were in effect for less than a decade as the current Constitution was ratified on March 4, 1789.
he thought that the articles of confederation were fine and were decently handled ^^ his view at first. then when he got to the constitutional convention, he saw the flaws/weaknesses in the articles and took on a more anti-fed view.
Dey of Algiers
No, 9/13 was required to pass a law. However all 13 had to be in agreement to Amend the Articles of Confederation which is why it took years to get rid of the poorly run government.
Under the articles, the government took control of the Revolutionary War. It negotiated the peace. The major accomplishment of the Government under the Articles of Confederation was the North West Ordinance. It set up the system for surveying the land west of the original 13 colonies.
they decided to do the constitution
the articles of confederation and the constitution are both the same because they both are written and the difference is that they tell different things. and i dont know but i just wanted to do something so i took a long shot at it
The constitutional convention was held to replace the articles of Confederation. The articles were the government before they wrote the constitution. James Madison famously took notes on this convention.
It was the Articles of Confederation that took effect in 1781. They were found to be ineffective and eventually the Constitution was written.