"Madison" was James Madison, Secretary of State under President Thomas Jefferson, who was named as the respondent in the case because his office (really Jefferson) refused to deliver some justice of the peace commissions to people John Adams appointed before leaving office.
The official citation of the case is Marbury v. Madison,5 US 137 (1803)
For more information, see Related Questions, below.
judicial branch in the marbury v Madison case
No. The Embargo Act was passed in 1807; Marbury v. Madison was heard in 1803.
No. Marbury v. Madison, (1803) didn't even touch on states' rights.
it set up a system of judicial review
John Marshall was the Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court from 1801 to 1835. He is connected to the case of Marbury v. Madison because he wrote the landmark decision in that case, establishing the principle of judicial review, which gives the Supreme Court the power to declare laws unconstitutional.
Marbury v. Madison established the practice of judicial review.
The Marbury v. Madison court case increased the Court's power. They decided if the laws were unconstitutional.
The US Supreme Court heard the Marbury v. Madison case in 1803.Marbury v. Madison is considered one of the most important cases in the history of the Supreme Court.
Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (Cranch 1) 137 (1803)
Marbury v. Madison
Marbury vs Madison was an ingenious decision. Marbury vs Madison was the first case of judicial review that voided the act of congress.
John Marshall established the principle of judicial review in Marbury v. Madison.
The judicial power to decide whether a law is constitutional.
Marbury v. Madison
The case of Marbury V Madison is important in a few ways. The main way it is important is because it was the first U.S. Supreme Court case to apply the principle of judicial review.
The case of Marbury V Madison is important in a few ways. The main way it is important is because it was the first U.S. Supreme Court case to apply the principle of judicial review.
The case of Marbury v. Madison overturned the legal precedent that allowed the Supreme Court to issue writs of mandamus to government officials.