answersLogoWhite

0

James Otis made this claim in 1764. What he really said was 'the (English) Parliament had no right to tax unrepresented subject....no more right to make 2 and 2, 5. ' He was wrong but he gained a lot of American support.

What he was angry about was the British taxation system of the time: This came about because of what Americans perceived as the unfair amount of taxes levied upon them by the British government. Britain still owned the thirteen states and subjected them to the same taxes as those in Britain - and more.

In October 1763, the British government decided that they wanted to stabilize their western boundaries and so no colonial settlements should be made westwards of the Alleghanies.. and to police this boundary, taxes would be raised from both American and British subjects. At the same time they tightened the rules of the Navigation Act, which controlled imports and exports; thereby taxing goods such as wheat, flax, hemp, cattle, horses, timber and furs. Then the British imposed the Sugar Act, collecting extra duties on sugar. The following year came the Stamp Act - a tax on newspapers, legal documents, cargo clearances and licquor or 'pub' licences.

Opposition to the taxes in the form of protests, headed by the group Sons of Liberty caused the British government to repeal the Stamp Act in 1776, but they came back with a new Act, which confirmed Parliament's right to tax any of its colonies however it deemed fit.

Americans, in less than ten years would deliberately choose the path of revolution rather than accept this.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about General History

Why was taxation without representation a huge complaint by the colonists?

Taxation without representation was a huge complaint by the colonists because they believed it violated their rights as English citizens. They argued that since they had no elected representatives in the British Parliament, they had no say in decisions regarding taxation. This lack of representation was seen as unfair and oppressive, leading to increasing tensions between the colonists and the British government.


Did Samuel Adams say taxation without representation is tyranny?

Yes, Samuel Adams is often credited with the phrase "taxation without representation is tyranny." He used this sentiment to articulate the American colonists' grievances against British rule, emphasizing that it was unjust to impose taxes on them without their consent or representation in Parliament. This idea became a rallying cry for the American Revolution, highlighting the importance of self-governance and fair representation.


What British actions were unpopular with colonists why did they resist these actions?

The Stamp Act, among others, increased taxes on the colonists without them having any say over it. "Taxation without representation" was a major grievance of the colonists.


Why did the colonists rebel against British taxes?

"taxation without representation " the colonist where mad because they didn't have a say in what to do in parliament they just chose for them.


What is the cause of the taxation without representation?

The colonists were being taxed and they felt they had no say in their tax ammounts, this was one of the main reasons the revoulutionary war began. I know this because I just finsished that part in Soicial Studies.

Related Questions

What do people mean when they say no taxation without representation?

No


What does taxation without represention is tyranny mean?

Taxation without representation is tyranny means that it is unfair to have to pay taxes if uyou dont have a say in it............ Taxation without representation is tyranny means that it is unfair to have to pay taxes if uyou dont have a say in it............


Did Thomas Jefferson say No taxation without representation?

No. Jonathan Mayhew did


What is it called when the colonists did not have a say about the taxes they had to pay?

No taxation without representation.


What do Washington DC license plates say?

taxation without representation


What were the results of taxation without representation?

i dont get what u are trying to say


What are some things that a anger colonist might say?

"No taxation without representation!"


The colonist did not have a say in the British taxes they had to pay what is it called?

"No taxation without representation".


What was the date when no taxation without representation started?

No taxation without representation occurred in 2012


When did the colonist say taxation without representation?

It means England can't tax them without someone to represent them.


What does the phrase '' no taxation without representation mean''?

"no taxation without representation" means that they dont want taxes without somebody to speak for them (the colonists)


What is the phrase that states that colonists had no say in deciding what were proper taxes form England?

"Taxation WITHOUT representation".