Patrick Henry is the correct answer
the colonies would not be okay with the tea act in any case because they did not want taxation without representation
The colonists faced several taxes and laws imposed by the British government without their consent, most notably the Stamp Act of 1765 and the Townshend Acts of 1767. These measures required colonists to pay taxes on everyday items and legal documents, igniting widespread protests and cries of "no taxation without representation." The lack of colonial representation in Parliament fueled resentment and ultimately contributed to the push for independence. This imposition of laws and taxes without local approval was a significant factor leading to the American Revolution.
"A loyal supporter of one's country"Patriot's Day (April 19th) has been observed as a legal holiday in the states of Maine and Massachusetts since 1894.
British colonists were upset about the Stamp Act of 1765 because it imposed direct taxation on a wide range of printed materials, including newspapers and legal documents, without their consent. They believed this violated their rights as Englishmen, as they had no representation in Parliament to voice their objections. The rallying cry of "no taxation without representation" emerged, reflecting their frustration over being taxed by a distant government. This discontent ultimately fueled the growing desire for independence from British rule.
You can appeal on the grounds of insufficient, or ineffective, counsel. It doesn't get granted very often, but it is one option.
Yes;if the company rules and regulations dictates non legal representation. It is also advisable not to allow such representation to avoid complicating issues.
You would treat an LLC like any individual. They would be risking a lot to go into something without legal representation.
One thing only, retain legal counsel. If you cannot afford a private attorney, voluntarily surrender yourself to authorities and request legal representation at your arraignment. Do not 'make a deal' nor impart any information concerning the without having consulted with your legal counsel.
Yes, it is possible to file a lawsuit without a lawyer, but it can be complex and challenging. It is recommended to seek legal advice or representation to navigate the legal process effectively.
If you used someone's credit card without permission then they could press charges against you, in which case you would need legal representation. If they let you use the card, then no.
"Nom legal" typically refers to a situation where a legal action or process has been initiated by a person acting as their own legal representative, without the assistance of a lawyer. It is important to note that navigating the legal system without proper legal representation can be complex and may not be advisable in all cases.
There can sometimes be legal representation but not in all cases. It will depend on how in depth the case is and if it can be resolved with out legal assistance.
im not sure
Boston Legal - 2004 Patriot Acts 4-20 is rated/received certificates of: Argentina:13
get legal representation and appeal
Your question is not entirely clear. One must comply with the marriage laws of one's state (residency requirement, marriage license, legal age, etc.), and the person performing the marriage must be legally authorized to do so (clergyman, justice of the peace, ship's captain, etc.), but it is not necessary for any party to have a lawyer or "legal representation" in that regard.
you are doing something bad