Sharecropping most often harmed African American farmers in the post-Civil War South. This system perpetuated economic dependency and kept them in a cycle of poverty, as they had to give a significant portion of their crop yields to landowners in exchange for land and supplies. Additionally, exploitative practices and unfair contracts often left sharecroppers in debt, making it difficult for them to achieve financial independence.
The Greeks
Identifying a single historical figure who has caused the most harm is complex, as many leaders and regimes have contributed to significant suffering. Figures like Adolf Hitler, responsible for the Holocaust and World War II, and Joseph Stalin, whose policies led to widespread famine and purges, are often cited for their devastating impacts on humanity. Their actions resulted in the deaths of millions and left deep scars on societies. Ultimately, the assessment of harm is subjective and can vary based on historical interpretation and context.
john cena
By 1880, most southern farmers were struggling economically, largely due to the aftermath of the Civil War and the abolition of slavery. Many had transitioned to sharecropping or tenant farming, which often left them in cycles of debt and poverty. The cotton economy remained dominant, but fluctuating prices and poor soil conditions compounded their difficulties. Overall, these factors contributed to widespread economic hardship and a lack of social mobility for many southern agricultural workers.
Roger Williams
Land Owners.
sharecropping
southern states after the civil war
During the Reconstruction era, sharecropping became a widespread agricultural practice, particularly in the Southern United States. This system allowed landowners to provide land, tools, and seeds to tenant farmers, most of whom were formerly enslaved people, in exchange for a share of the crop. While it offered some opportunity for independence, it often resulted in cycles of debt and poverty, perpetuating economic challenges for many African American families. Sharecropping thus became a significant aspect of the agricultural landscape during this period.
The South needed a cheap form of labor like sharecropping because they faced labor shortages after the abolition of slavery. Sharecropping allowed landowners to retain control over agricultural production while providing former slaves and poor whites with a means of livelihood, albeit in a system that often exploited them economically.
Sharecropping, in which a wealthy landowner rents land to farmers in exchange for a share of their crops
Most forms of torture require intense bodily harm and often result in health problems.
The most independent farming arrangement for both parties in the South during Reconstruction was sharecropping. In this system, landowners provided land, tools, and seeds to tenant farmers, who were often formerly enslaved individuals, in exchange for a share of the crop produced. This arrangement allowed tenant farmers a degree of autonomy in their work and decision-making, while landowners benefited from labor without the costs of hiring workers outright. However, sharecropping often led to cycles of debt and economic dependency, limiting true independence for the farmers involved.
Ghosts are often found in historical places or at some families house that has done harm to somebody or something.
Yes they can and do. Most often you will see it on the comb and it generally causes no significant harm to the bird, but it can make a mess when it thaws out.
Most people do not.
The pronoun 'whom' is the objective form of the pronoun 'who'.The word 'whom' (and 'who') is an interrogative pronounand a relative pronoun.The pronoun 'whom' is most often used as the object of a preposition.Examples:With whom did you stay? (interrogative, object of the preposition 'with')The person for whom I ordered the flowers is my mother. (relative pronoun, object of the preposition 'for')Who was on the phone? (interrogative, subject of the sentence)My son Thomas, who you met last year, is staying for the weekend. (relative pronoun, subject of the relative clause)