Parliament believed the colonists would accept the Tea Act of 1773 because it lowered the price of tea for the colonists, making it more affordable than smuggled tea. Additionally, Parliament thought the colonists would be willing to pay the tax on tea to support British authority.
Yes, the colonists were justified. They had been asking for Parliament representation for a decade, without results. The actions of Parliament was retaliatory, and created resentment that had not previously existed in the colonies. Diplomacy probably would have curtailed the revolution. However, Parliament attempted to subjugate rather than negotiate.
The American colonists wanted to have representation in the British parliament so they would have a voice regarding taxation. This was to the British, a privilege they would not support.
British parliament thought the colonists should pay the cost of the war that is why the British parliament thought this war that the french would win in the war.
1774first, parliament shut down the port of Boston, and no ship could enter or leave the harbor. the harbor would stay closed until the colonists could pay british taxes.after that, parliament didnt let Massachusetts colonists to hold town meetings more than once a year without the governor's permission.thirdly, parliament said that officers and other officials who were accused of crime had to be tried in Britain, not Massachusetts.lastly, parliament passed a quartering act, in which colonists were forced to house british troops in their homes.
With a really good King or Queen and a bunch of loyal followers.
Some reasons why Parliament believed that the colonists would accept the Tea Act of 1773 are:The revenues raised by this act would go toward the defense of the colonies.The colonial assemblies would collect the revenues raised by this act.This act repealed the offensive Townshend Duties that taxed all imports.This act substantially lowered the price of tea sold in the colonies.
The parliament interpreted the colonists reactions in one way. The parliament agreed to let the colonies have representation in the Parliament.
the answer is because Boston would be punished and the parliament decided to close the port of Boston until the colonists paid for their tea . In which the colonists called parliments actions the Intolerable Acts.
Trade with the colonies was economically important to Great Britain. The colonists thought the economic implications would be enough for the British Parliament to repeal the Intolerable Acts.
stamp tax money would be used to defend the colonies
so that the colonists would know that the king was in charge
The American colonists wanted to have representation in the British parliament so they would have a voice regarding taxation. This was to the British, a privilege they would not support.
Then we would still be with our "Mother Country"
Yes, the colonists were justified. They had been asking for Parliament representation for a decade, without results. The actions of Parliament was retaliatory, and created resentment that had not previously existed in the colonies. Diplomacy probably would have curtailed the revolution. However, Parliament attempted to subjugate rather than negotiate.
The American colonists wanted to have representation in the British parliament so they would have a voice regarding taxation. This was to the British, a privilege they would not support.
British parliament thought the colonists should pay the cost of the war that is why the British parliament thought this war that the french would win in the war.
they belived that because they traided on the king and on there contry