0
Why did Parliament believe the colonists would accept the Tea Act of 1773?
Wiki User
∙ 9y ago
Some reasons why Parliament believed that the colonists would accept the Tea Act of 1773 are:
- The revenues raised by this act would go toward the defense of the colonies.
- The colonial assemblies would collect the revenues raised by this act.
- This act repealed the offensive Townshend Duties that taxed all imports.
- This act substantially lowered the price of tea sold in the colonies.
Wiki User
∙ 9y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How did the colonies believe they should be governed?
The colonists eventually decided that they wanted to be a sovergin nation but at first they felt that they should have a say, or representation, in the British legislation, Parliament. "No taxation without representation" was a popular slogan for the colonists. Fair representation in Parliament wouldn't have gotten the colonists what they really wanted, they would just have been out voted by other members of Parliament. The colonists felt that if they were to be taxed and forced to comply with British law set by a far-away nation who couldn't understand the needs of the Colonies, that they should at least have a say in what goes on concerning their way of life. It was more of the principle of the matter that really rallied the colonists against the British. This, along with other issues led to the American Revolution which the Colonies fight for their freedom from Great Britain after the British refused to reconize them as an emerging, sovergin nation,
What would be different without the first continental congress?
The First Continental Congress created the Declaration of Rights (declared that colonists were not represented in English Parliament, only colony legislatures could tax colonists) and the Continental Association which enforced a limited boycott set against trade with England.
Who was involved in the townshend acts?
The Townshend acts were one of the main things that led the US Revolutionary War. The acts involved the parliament of Britain and the colonists in what would become America.
The purpose of the stamp act and the tea acts?
The purpose of Parliament's Sugar Act of 1764 and the Stamp Act of 1765 was to raise money to help pay off debts from the French and Indian War (1756 - 1763). The colonists objected strongly to these taxes, believing that Parliament could not levy a tax on colonists because they had no representation in Parliament. Parliament revoked the Stamp Act but did not want the colonists to think they had agreed to the principle that it could not tax the colonists. The Townshend Acts were a series of laws passed by Parliament imposing taxes on the thirteen colonies. They included the Revenue Act of 1767, the Indemnity Act, the Commissioners of Customs Act, the Vice Admiralty Court Act, and the New York Restraining Act. Their main purposes were: to raise money to pay the salaries of Royal governors and judges in the colonies by imposing "duties" (import taxes) on necessities such as paper, paint, glass, and tea (previously, the governors were appointed by the King but were paid by the colonies; if the colonials were not happy with the way their governor exercised his considerable powers, they could fight back by refusing in the colonial legislature to allocate any money to pay him); to become able to enforce stricter compliance with trade regulations, by establishing new customs offices and by giving customs officers broad powers to search businesses and homes; and to establish definitively that the British Parliament had the power to tax the colonies. Colonists objected to all of these taxes. Their responses included protests, boycotts, and an increase in the amount of smuggling - illegally importing tea and other items without reporting it to the British customs officers and paying duties. The purpose of the Tea Act of 1773 was to undercut the price of smuggled tea, so that colonists would purchase tea instead from the British East India Company. Since Townshend Act duties had been paid on this tea, Parliament reasoned that by purchasing it, colonists would have been implicitly agreeing to accept Parliament's right to tax them without representation.
Why might colonists in a proprietary colony be unhappy if their colony were converted to a royal colony?
Colonist would be unhappy because The King or Parliament would want to collect taxes. Royal Colonies were controlled by kings or rulers of nations and proprietary colonies were controlled by the people
How would parliament have interpreted the colonists reactions?
The parliament interpreted the colonists reactions in one way. The parliament agreed to let the colonies have representation in the Parliament.
Why did colonists think a ban on trade would force parliament to repeal the Intolerable Acts?
Trade with the colonies was economically important to Great Britain. The colonists thought the economic implications would be enough for the British Parliament to repeal the Intolerable Acts.
Why did parliament think colonists should be willing to pay the stamp act taxes?
stamp tax money would be used to defend the colonies
What right under the form of government did colonists cherish above all?
The American colonists wanted to have representation in the British parliament so they would have a voice regarding taxation. This was to the British, a privilege they would not support.
What if Parliament and King George the third had implemented a more agreeable policy with colonists?
Then we would still be with our "Mother Country"
Were the colonists justified in their list of grievances?
Yes, the colonists were justified. They had been asking for Parliament representation for a decade, without results. The actions of Parliament was retaliatory, and created resentment that had not previously existed in the colonies. Diplomacy probably would have curtailed the revolution. However, Parliament attempted to subjugate rather than negotiate.
What was the rusult of the French and Indian War?
British parliament thought the colonists should pay the cost of the war that is why the British parliament thought this war that the french would win in the war.
What right under the British form of government did colonists cherish above all?
The American colonists wanted to have representation in the British parliament so they would have a voice regarding taxation. This was to the British, a privilege they would not support.
What year did the Intolerable Acts start?
1774first, parliament shut down the port of Boston, and no ship could enter or leave the harbor. the harbor would stay closed until the colonists could pay british taxes.after that, parliament didnt let Massachusetts colonists to hold town meetings more than once a year without the governor's permission.thirdly, parliament said that officers and other officials who were accused of crime had to be tried in Britain, not Massachusetts.lastly, parliament passed a quartering act, in which colonists were forced to house british troops in their homes.
What are the effects of no taxation without representation?
In 1689, the English government passed a "Bill of Rights" for its citizens. An important right granted by the Bill is that if you are paying taxes, you should have a say in what happens with those taxes. By the time of the American Revolution, Parliament existed as a way for English citizens to "have a say"- they would vote for someone to go to London and represent them and their interests.However, people in the American Colonies- who were considered Englishmen just like everyone else- were not able to vote in Parliament's elections. After the French and Indian War (also known as the "Seven Years War" to Europeans), Parliament was forced to raise taxes to pay for the debts incurred during the war, and to fight Indian tribes that occasionally raided the colonies. The Colonists became upset, because they had no right to vote. Additionally, the King and Parliament occasionally passed laws that the Colonists didn't like, such as the King's proclamation of 1763 or the Quebec Act.Some members of Parliament argued that while it was true that Colonists couldn't vote, they were "virtually represented" by members who shared their views and interests; therefore, it wasn't necessary for the Colonists to actually vote. Not many people, even in Parliament, accepted this reason, however.So when Parliament passed its tax bills, the Colonists usually protested, boycotted, and revolted against them. Parliament usually quickly rescinded the taxes, but maintained that it still had the right to raise those taxes. An important aspect of English (and American) law is the idea of precedence- that is, if the law works a certain way one time, then it works that same way in the future. So Parliament kept passing taxes, hoping that if the Colonists would accept one of them, then the precedent would be set and then Parliament would be free to continue managing taxes. Unfortunately for them, the Colonists never fell for the "trick" and the Revolution ended it once and for all.
How might have England been able to successfully enforce its rule on the colonies without causing rebellion?
With a really good King or Queen and a bunch of loyal followers.
Which colonists would have been unlikely to have grievances against the British government by April 1775?
none, all colonists were highly and strictly against all the undecided taxation rules the british had layed upon the colonists without it being even addressed in the Parliament.
