Because he was appointed by god and knew what was right :)
he argued over money, religion and power(divine right).
The main issue between Charles I and Parliament revolved around the struggle for power and governance in England. Charles believed in the divine right of kings, which led him to assert his authority without parliamentary consent, particularly concerning taxation and military matters. Parliament, on the other hand, sought to limit his power and ensure a greater role in governance, ultimately leading to conflicts that escalated into the English Civil War. This power struggle highlighted broader tensions over representation, authority, and the role of the monarchy in a constitutional framework.
Because he wanted more power for himself and didn't want parliament getting in the way. He basically did when the king before him did
James I and Charles I quarreled with Parliament primarily over issues of authority and governance. Both monarchs believed in the divine right of kings, which led them to resist parliamentary control over taxation and legislation. Their attempts to rule without Parliament and impose unpopular policies, such as taxes and religious changes, fueled tensions and ultimately contributed to the English Civil War. Additionally, conflicts over issues like religion and the extent of royal power further exacerbated their disputes with Parliament.
King Charles devoured parliament because they would not give him money to waste on battles and have parties with his friends and to buy expensive gifts to make people like him more and more so he could have more friends to fight battles with. After a while he got
well Charles ! with Parliament because Charles did not give them enough power and so the civil war broke out on really what seems to be Parliament and Charles fighting over power!!!!!!!x
because the king wanted power over England and Parliament did as well
he argued over money, religion and power(divine right).
Parliament kept trying to get more and more power which led to Charles making wrong decisions. The Petition of Right was one of these occasions. Parliament even wanted control over Charles kids education!
== == If you mean what powers does Prince Charles have, the answer is none. Even as sovereign, Queen Elizabeth exercises a lot no power, she reigns but does not rule. Power is wielded in her name by the Parliament and the governing ministry acceptable to Parliament. Prince Charles, as heir to the throne, has no power at all over the government. He merely has a variety of ceremonial duties which they assign to him while he waits to become king.
Because he wanted more power for himself and didn't want parliament getting in the way. He basically did when the king before him did
Charles I was executed in 1649 after being found guilty of high treason by the English Parliament during the English Civil War. He had repeatedly clashed with Parliament over issues of power and authority, leading to his overthrow and eventual trial and execution.
There were many different causes of the English Civil war in 1642, here are just a few... - Charles was hungry for power - Charles believed in the Divine Right of Kings - Whilst Charles's father was reining over England, he observed the broken relationship between the King and Parliament. He then grew up to have the same relationship with Parliament - Charles was naturally arrogant - Charles was in need of money but was very reluctant to bring back Parliament so he resorted to collected illegal 'Ship' tax without permission - Charles married Henrietta Maria of France who was catholic - Drastic changes were being made to the churches Hope this helped!
Since the reign of Charles I of England, Britain has been a constitutional monarchy. All Kings and Queens before Charles had ABSOULTE power, meaning they had complete control over their people. Since King Charles I had an extremely large fall out with the government and parliament, Britain has been controlled by it's parliament, with the Queen acting merely as a figure head.
James I and Charles I quarreled with Parliament primarily over issues of authority and governance. Both monarchs believed in the divine right of kings, which led them to resist parliamentary control over taxation and legislation. Their attempts to rule without Parliament and impose unpopular policies, such as taxes and religious changes, fueled tensions and ultimately contributed to the English Civil War. Additionally, conflicts over issues like religion and the extent of royal power further exacerbated their disputes with Parliament.
King Charles devoured parliament because they would not give him money to waste on battles and have parties with his friends and to buy expensive gifts to make people like him more and more so he could have more friends to fight battles with. After a while he got
Charles started the English Civil War. Slightly over-reacting, don't you think?