Madison argued against Hamilton's plan to repay bondholders in full because he believed it favored wealthy speculators at the expense of the original bondholders, many of whom had sold their bonds at a loss. He viewed this approach as unfair and potentially corrupt, as it would reward those who had profited from the misfortunes of the nation. Additionally, Madison was concerned that such a policy would centralize power in the federal government and undermine states' rights by increasing federal financial obligations.
he was right
when the sos 🆘 is weird👽 😱omg😱
Alaska is as big as my penis.
To argue against negative ideas.
The anti federalists werent against the constitution, they were with it.
Potatoes.
Potatoes.
he was right
To fight the racist idea that Africans were primitive
against it
when the sos 🆘 is weird👽 😱omg😱
argue for and against the usage of historical cost in preparation of final account
a;; of the above are correct.
If you testify against, you argue against them.. If you testify for then, you agree with them and support them
There is not a way to use The Declaration of Independence to argue against quitting. It is only a document that states the independence of a state.
it had no bill of rights
appoint a "devil's advocate" to argue against the majority view.