it had no Bill of Rights
The anti federalists werent against the constitution, they were with it.
The anti - federalist argued against ratification. They attacked nearly every part of the new document.
The Federalist Party was so named because of their support of the Federal Constitution. Some members of the Federalist Party were the authors of the Federalist Papers, a series of pamphlets meant to argue for the ratification of the Constitution.
The Constitution was ratified on June 21, 1788. The first day of the First Congress was March 4, 1789. I think I'd argue that the House was "formed" the day of ratification, even though there weren't any members of the House yet.
About Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson
To fight the racist idea that Africans were primitive
The Federalist Papers were written to promote the ratification of the U.S. Constitution, advocating for a strong central government while addressing concerns about potential tyranny. Authored by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay, these essays aimed to clarify the Constitution's provisions and argue for the benefits of a unified federal system. In contrast, the Anti-Federalist Papers expressed opposition to the Constitution, emphasizing the need to protect individual liberties and state sovereignty, and warning against the dangers of a powerful central government. Together, these writings shaped the debate over the Constitution and the future of American governance.
You could argue that.
against it
argue for and against the usage of historical cost in preparation of final account
a;; of the above are correct.
he wanted to prove it was a law, and it was in the constitution