the English deposed the king, and Massachusetts deposed the governor
The British were responsible. They were trying to show they had more power, and keep control over the colonists
John Smith
please help, thank you
i think they both wanted control over the fur trade
The British punished the colonists for their resistance and defiance, particularly following events like the Boston Tea Party, through a series of punitive measures known as the Coercive Acts (or Intolerable Acts) in 1774. These laws included closing Boston Harbor, revoking Massachusetts' charter, and allowing British troops to be quartered in colonists' homes. The intent was to assert control and quell dissent, but they ultimately fueled further anger and unity among the colonies, leading to increased calls for independence.
The Bolsheviks.
The Council for New England issued a patent in order to send businessmen to America. They became the Massachusetts Bay Settlers and became independent of England's control. The colonists followed strict, Puritan beliefs.
.The British soldiers were housed by colonists . Massachusetts was put under control of Thomas Gage (a British general). The port of Boston was closed down and no colonists could import or export
An autocratic leader dictates all the work processes. He or she has absolute control over a group of workers, making decisions without consulting his or her subordinates. An autocratic leader is also usually unreceptive to changes in the business environment.
There are a number of advantages of autocratic leadership style. Some of them include streamlined workflow, total control and ability to make quick decisions among others.
The Massachusetts Government Act created even more outrage than the Port Act because it unilaterally altered the government of Massachusetts to bring it under control of the British government. Under the terms of the Government Act, almost all positions in the colonial government were to be appointed by the governor or the king. The act also severely limited the activities of town meetings in Massachusetts. Colonists outside Massachusetts feared that their governments could now also be changed by the legislative fiat of Parliament.
As the Cuban dictator Fidel Castro has full autocratic control over the country.
Autocratic leadership, also known as authoritarian leadership, is a leadership style characterized by individual control over all decisions and little input from group members. Autocratic leaders typically make choices based on their own ideas and judgments and rarely accept advice from followers. Autocratic leadership involves absolute, authoritarian control over a group.
One method of control used by the elite on rebellious colonists was to charge people with anger towards the British.
One method of control used by the elite on rebellious colonists was to charge people with anger towards the British.
Because it is like a mother and daughter relationship. The British had control over the colonists for a long time. The British did kinda baby them for a while , then British turned. And the colonists was like what is going on; and the British wanted to control the colonists and the colonists had enough so the wanted to rebel. So to answer the question , because the British felt like they were in control because they kinda took the colonists under there wing.
An autocratic leader is a manager with complete control over employees and uses strong voice and verbal uses to maintain people's attention to take charge and take responsibility for the way a particular business or workplace is run