Roman emperors where so powerful because they were the absolute rules of the vast Roman Empire and were in charge of the large Roman army, which was the most powerful army. Only the Persians could match the military might of the Romans.
The five ancient Rome is emperors there where only five emperors
All Roman Emperors were famous in their own way. There were 192 people who claimed the title Emperor of Rome from 27 BC when the Emperor Augustus took control of the Senate until 1185 AD. Some of the later such would now be called Byzantine Emperors, but a the time they called themselves Roman Emperors. Second answer. Generally speaking most historians separate the ancient Roman empire and the Byzantine empire. The Byzantine empire lasted until 1453 AD when the Ottoman Turks took over Constantinople.
no the division of the roman empire was so that the empire could be easier to govern and so it wasn't the division but actually the emperors. also that is why the Byzantine empire lasted longer.
Yes.
Tiberius, Caligula, Claudius, and Nero
No. Only Rome had emperors as only Rome was an empire. Greece was never an empire so never had an emperor.No. Only Rome had emperors as only Rome was an empire. Greece was never an empire so never had an emperor.No. Only Rome had emperors as only Rome was an empire. Greece was never an empire so never had an emperor.No. Only Rome had emperors as only Rome was an empire. Greece was never an empire so never had an emperor.No. Only Rome had emperors as only Rome was an empire. Greece was never an empire so never had an emperor.No. Only Rome had emperors as only Rome was an empire. Greece was never an empire so never had an emperor.No. Only Rome had emperors as only Rome was an empire. Greece was never an empire so never had an emperor.No. Only Rome had emperors as only Rome was an empire. Greece was never an empire so never had an emperor.No. Only Rome had emperors as only Rome was an empire. Greece was never an empire so never had an emperor.
They ran the country/empire, decided on laws along with the senate.
The five ancient Rome is emperors there where only five emperors
All Roman Emperors were famous in their own way. There were 192 people who claimed the title Emperor of Rome from 27 BC when the Emperor Augustus took control of the Senate until 1185 AD. Some of the later such would now be called Byzantine Emperors, but a the time they called themselves Roman Emperors. Second answer. Generally speaking most historians separate the ancient Roman empire and the Byzantine empire. The Byzantine empire lasted until 1453 AD when the Ottoman Turks took over Constantinople.
no the division of the roman empire was so that the empire could be easier to govern and so it wasn't the division but actually the emperors. also that is why the Byzantine empire lasted longer.
Ancient Rome had many, good emperors. Some of them were Augustus, Tiberius (yes, Tiberius, he left the empire in excellent financial shape), Claudius, Vespasian, Trajan and Hadrian.
Yes.
In the entire Roman empire there were 178 emperors. There were 81 emperors of the west and 97 emperors of the east.
The Roman Empire was not a kingdom. It was Empire. Empires have Emperors.
Tiberius, Caligula, Claudius, and Nero
yes, and no. Ancient Rome had a senate and they were in charge for some time, but they soon got emperors. Some of the emperors, such as Julius Caesar, wanted to become King, but he was killed. After that, they just stuck with emperors.
No